Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33453
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Explaining outcome differences between men and women following mild traumatic brain injury
Author(s): Mikolic, Ana
Oude Groeniger, Joost
Zeldovich, Marina
Wilson, Lindsay
Roeters van Lennep, Jeanine E
van Klaveren, David
Polinder, Suzanne
Contact Email: l.wilson@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: sex differences
traumatic brain injury
mediation
outcomes
sociodemographic factors
care pathways
Issue Date: Dec-2021
Date Deposited: 13-Oct-2021
Citation: Mikolic A, Oude Groeniger J, Zeldovich M, Wilson L, Roeters van Lennep JE, van Klaveren D & Polinder S (2021) Explaining outcome differences between men and women following mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 38 (23), pp. 3315-3331. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2021.0116
Abstract: Men and women differ in outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). In the CENTER-TBI study, we previously found that women had worse 6-month functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Score Extended (GOSE)), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and mental health following mild TBI. The aim of this study was to investigate whether those differences were mediated by psychiatric history, gender- related sociodemographic variables, or by care pathways. We analyzed sex/gender differences in 6-month GOSE, generic and TBI-specific HRQoL, post-concussion and mental health symptoms using three sets of mediators: psychiatric history, sociodemographic variables (living alone, living with children, education and employment status/job category), and care-pathways (referral to study hospital and discharge destination after Emergency Room); while controlling for a substantial number of potential confounders (pre-injury health, and injury-related characteristics). We included 1842 men and 1022 women (16+) with a Glasgow Coma Score 13-15, amongst whom 83% had GOSE available and about 60% other 6-month outcomes. We used natural effects models to decompose the total effect of sex/gender on the outcomes into indirect effects that passed through the specified mediators, and the remaining direct effects. In our study population, women had worse outcomes and these were only partly explained by psychiatric history, and not considerably explained by sociodemographic variables nor by care pathways. Other factors than differences in specified variables seem to underlie observed differences between men and women in outcomes after mild TBI. Future studies should explore more aspects of gender roles and identity, and biological factors underpinning sex and gender differences in TBI outcomes.
DOI Link: 10.1089/neu.2021.0116
Rights: This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (CC-BY) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
neu.2021.0116.pdfFulltext - Published Version486.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.