|Appears in Collections:||Economics Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||How Do Subjective Life Expectancies Compare with Mortality Tables? Similarities and Differences in Three National Samples|
|Keywords:||Economics and Econometrics|
Life-span and Life-course Studies
|Citation:||Bell D, Comerford D & Douglas E (2020) How Do Subjective Life Expectancies Compare with Mortality Tables? Similarities and Differences in Three National Samples. Journal of the Economics of Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2020.100241|
|Abstract:||Estimates of personal longevity play a vital role in decisions relating to asset accumulation and decumulation. Subjective life expectancy (SLE) is a measure of individuals’ expectation of remaining years of life. Either explicitly or implicitly, it is a key determinant of consumption and savings behaviour, and may be guided by a person’s own health and health behaviours. The Gateway to Global Aging, a platform for the Health and Retirement Study’s (HRS) family of population surveys, provides harmonised longitudinal datasets for many countries, each based on individual survey responses from respondents aged 50 and above. In this paper, we analyse SLE three of these datasets: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), The Irish Longitudinal Study of Ageing (TILDA) and Healthy Ageing in Scotland (HAGIS). First, we focus on measurement of SLE, followed by the SLE differential – the discrepancy between SLE and mortality risk indicated by population life tables. One novel finding from our analysis is that the SLE differential is positive for Ireland and is negative for Scotland and England. This difference does not appear to be explained by differences of survey design or population characteristics.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Notes:||Output Status: Forthcoming/Available Online|
|1-s2.0-S2212828X20300062-main.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||726.68 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 2021-01-26 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.