Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30769
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBell, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorComerford, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Elaineen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-29T01:20:56Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-29T01:20:56Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06en_UK
dc.identifier.other100241en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30769-
dc.description.abstractEstimates of personal longevity play a vital role in decisions relating to asset accumulation and decumulation. Subjective life expectancy (SLE) is a measure of individuals’ expectation of remaining years of life. Either explicitly or implicitly, it is a key determinant of consumption and savings behaviour, and may be guided by a person’s own health and health behaviours. The Gateway to Global Aging, a platform for the Health and Retirement Study’s (HRS) family of population surveys, provides harmonised longitudinal datasets for many countries, each based on individual survey responses from respondents aged 50 and above. In this paper, we analyse SLE three of these datasets: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), The Irish Longitudinal Study of Ageing (TILDA) and Healthy Ageing in Scotland (HAGIS). First, we focus on measurement of SLE, followed by the SLE differential – the discrepancy between SLE and mortality risk indicated by population life tables. One novel finding from our analysis is that the SLE differential is positive for Ireland and is negative for Scotland and England. This difference does not appear to be explained by differences of survey design or population characteristics.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationBell D, Comerford D & Douglas E (2020) How Do Subjective Life Expectancies Compare with Mortality Tables? Similarities and Differences in Three National Samples. Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 16, Art. No.: 100241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2020.100241en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Bell D, Comerford D & Douglas E (2020) How Do Subjective Life Expectancies Compare with Mortality Tables? Similarities and Differences in Three National Samples. Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 16, Art. No.: 100241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2020.100241 © 2020, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectSubjective life expectancyen_UK
dc.subjectPerceived life expectancyen_UK
dc.subjectSurvivalen_UK
dc.titleHow Do Subjective Life Expectancies Compare with Mortality Tables? Similarities and Differences in Three National Samplesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2021-01-26en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Bell_Comerford_Douglas_Revision_Jan2020.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jeoa.2020.100241en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of the Economics of Ageingen_UK
dc.citation.issn2212-8298en_UK
dc.citation.issn2212-828Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume16en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderNational Institutes of Healthen_UK
dc.author.emailelaine.douglas@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date25/01/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEconomicsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEconomicsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEconomicsen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000564182000001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85081247646en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1513348en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4538-6328en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2611-9504en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8540-1126en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-01-22en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-01-22en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-01-27en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBell, David|0000-0002-4538-6328en_UK
local.rioxx.authorComerford, David|0000-0003-2611-9504en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDouglas, Elaine|0000-0001-8540-1126en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|National Institutes of Health|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-01-26en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2021-01-25en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2021-01-26|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameBell_Comerford_Douglas_Revision_Jan2020.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2212-8298en_UK
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bell_Comerford_Douglas_Revision_Jan2020.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version1.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.