|Appears in Collections:||Aquaculture Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Tools to study trends in community structure: application to fish and livestock trading networks|
Munro, Lorna Ann
Kao, Rowland R
Kiss, Istvan Z
|Citation:||Green D, Werkman M, Munro LA, Kao RR, Kiss IZ & Danon L (2011) Tools to study trends in community structure: application to fish and livestock trading networks, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 99 (2-4), pp. 225-228.|
|Abstract:||Partitioning of contact networks into communities allows groupings of epidemiologically related nodes to be derived, that could inform the design of disease surveillance and control strategies, e.g. contact tracing or design of `firebreaks' for disease spread. However, these are only of merit if they persist longer than the timescale of interventions. Here, we apply different methods to identify concordance between network partitions across time for two animal trading networks, those of salmon in Scotland (2002-4) and livestock in Great Britain (2003-4). Both trading networks are similar in that they moderately agree over time in terms of their community structures, but this concordance is higher -- and therefore community structure is more consistent -- when only the `core' network of nodes involved in trading over the whole time series is considered. In neither case was higher agreement found between partitions close together in time. These measures differ in their absolute values unless appropriate standardisation is applied. Once standardised, the measures gave similar values for both network types.|
|Rights:||Published in Preventive Veterinary Medicine by Elsevier. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Volume 99, Issues 2-4, May 2011, pp. 225 - 228.; This is the peer reviewed version of this article.; NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Preventive Veterinary Medicine. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Preventive Veterinary Medicine, VOL 99, ISSUE 2-4, (May 2011). DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.01.008.|
|TimeSeries_Appendix.pdf||287.84 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|TimeSeries5.pdf||143.59 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.