Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30343
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Are Fast Responses More Random? Testing the Effect of Response Time on Scale in an Online Choice Experiment
Author(s): Börger, Tobias
Contact Email: tobias.borger@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Attribute non-attendance
Choice experiment
Generalised multinomial logit
Offshore windfarm
Online survey
Response time
Scale heterogeneity
Issue Date: Oct-2016
Citation: Börger T (2016) Are Fast Responses More Random? Testing the Effect of Response Time on Scale in an Online Choice Experiment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 65 (2), pp. 389-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9905-1
Abstract: Scepticism over stated preference surveys conducted online revolves around the concerns over “professional respondents” who might rush through the questionnaire without sufficiently considering the information provided. To gain insight on the validity of this phenomenon and test the effect of response time on choice randomness, this study makes use of a recently conducted choice experiment survey on ecological and amenity effects of an offshore windfarm in the UK. The positive relationship between self-rated and inferred attribute attendance and response time is taken as evidence for a link between response time and cognitive effort. Subsequently, the generalised multinomial logit model is employed to test the effect of response time on scale, which indicates the weight of the deterministic relative to the error component in the random utility model. Results show that longer response time increases scale, i.e. decreases choice randomness. This positive scale effect of response time is further found to be non-linear and wear off at some point beyond which extreme response time decreases scale. While response time does not systematically affect welfare estimates, higher response time increases the precision of such estimates. These effects persist when self-reported choice certainty is controlled for. Implications of the results for online stated preference surveys and further research are discussed.
DOI Link: 10.1007/s10640-015-9905-1
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Börger2016_Article_AreFastResponsesMoreRandomTest.pdfFulltext - Published Version637.6 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.