Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Increased activities of hepatic antioxidant defence enzymes in juvenile gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) fed dietary oxidised oil: attenuation by dietary vitamin E
Author(s): Mourente, Gabriel
Diaz-Salvago, Esther
Bell, J Gordon
Tocher, Douglas R
Contact Email:
Keywords: Gilthead seabream
Sparus aurata
Vitamin E
Oxidised oil
Polyunsaturated fatty acids
Antioxidant defence enzymes
Fishes Nutrition Requirements
Fishes Feeding and feeds
Fishes Nutrition Requirments
Issue Date: Nov-2002
Date Deposited: 14-Apr-2011
Citation: Mourente G, Diaz-Salvago E, Bell JG & Tocher DR (2002) Increased activities of hepatic antioxidant defence enzymes in juvenile gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) fed dietary oxidised oil: attenuation by dietary vitamin E. Aquaculture, 214 (41000), pp. 343-361.;
Abstract: Previously, we had shown that altering the highly unsaturated fatty acid (HUFA)/vitamin E ratios in gilthead sea bream livers significantly affected their peroxidation status, with fish fed a diet rich in HUFA and low in vitamin E showing significantly higher values of lipid peroxidation products, without, however, significant effects on liver antioxidant defence enzyme activities. The aim of the present trial was to further characterise the biochemical indicators of peroxidative stress in juvenile gilthead sea bream. A high pro-oxidative stress was induced by feeding diets containing around 7% of the dry weight as n 3 HUFA. The potential peroxidative stress was increased by oxidising the oil, increasing the peroxide value of the oil some 10-fold. These oils were fed without or with supplemental vitamin E (a-tocopheryl acetate at 200 mg kg 1 dry diet) giving four diets in total. Fish were sampled after 30 and 60 days of feeding the experimental diets. None of the diets had any serious deleterious effects on growth and mortality of the fish during the trial. Similarly, there were few significant effects due to dietary oxidised oil or supplementary vitamin E on liver lipid and fatty acid profiles and, in particular, the proportions of HUFA were not decreased by dietary oxidised oil. The vitamin E content of the liver reflected the vitamin E content of the diets but was also affected by dietary oxidised oil being reduced by oxidised oil in fish fed diets without supplemental vitamin E but, unexpectedly, increased by oxidised oil in fish fed diets supplemented with vitamin E. Liver thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) levels were significantly lower in fish fed diets supplemented with vitamin E whereas dietary oxidised oil had no major effect on lipid peroxidation products. Catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities were both increased in fish fed dietary oxidised oil and reduced by supplementary vitamin E after 30 days feeding. In contrast, glutathione peroxidase (GPX) was less affected by the diets, and the activities of glutathione-Stransferase (GST) and glutathione reductase (GR) were only reduced by dietary vitamin E after 60 days of feeding. However, all the enzyme activities were significantly affected by the duration of feeding, but the number of interactions between the three factors (time, oil and vitamin E) showed that the relationships were complicated. In conclusion, the present study showed that feeding diets containing oxidised oil significantly affected the activities of liver antioxidant defence enzymes and that dietary vitamin E partially abrogated these effects. Growth and survival of the fish were relatively unaffected suggesting that the responses in gilthead sea bream offered effective protection. However, the duration of feeding the diets of high pro-oxidative stress was observed to have a hitherto unknown effect, possibly the result of an adaptive process, but which requires further investigation.
DOI Link: 10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00064-9
Rights: Published in Aquaculture by Elsevier. Aquaculture, Volume 214, Issues 1-4, November 2002, pp. 343 - 361.; This is the peer reviewed version of this article.; NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Aquaculture. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Aquaculture, VOL 214, ISSUE 1-4, (November 2002). DOI 10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00064-9.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
EUCadiz DT4 final.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version4.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.