http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28643
Appears in Collections: | Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Global trade networks determine the distribution of invasive non-native species |
Author(s): | Chapman, Daniel S Purse, Bethan V Roy, Helen E Bullock, James M |
Contact Email: | daniel.chapman@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | climate matching crop pests dispersal introduction invasive alien species pest outbreaks plant disease plant health transport |
Issue Date: | 31-Aug-2017 |
Date Deposited: | 28-Jan-2019 |
Citation: | Chapman DS, Purse BV, Roy HE & Bullock JM (2017) Global trade networks determine the distribution of invasive non-native species. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26 (8), pp. 907-917. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12599 |
Abstract: | Aim Although global trade is implicated in biological invasions, the assumption that trade networks explain the large‐scale distributions of non‐native species remains largely untested. We addressed this by analysing relationships between global trade networks and plant pest invasion. Location Forty‐eight countries in Europe and the Mediterranean. Time period Current. Major taxa studied Four hundred and twenty‐two non‐native plant pests (173 invertebrates, 166 pathogens, 83 plants). Methods Ten types of connectivity index were developed, representing potential roles of trade networks, air transport links, geographical proximity, climatic similarity and source country wealth in facilitating invasion. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) identified the connectivity index that best explained both historical and recent invasion. Then, more complex GLMMs were developed including connectivity through trade networks for multiple commodities relevant for pests (live plants, forest products, fruit and vegetables and seeds) and species’ transport associations with those commodities. Results Total import volumes, species’ global prevalence and connectivity measures based on air transport, geographical distance or climate did not explain invasion as well as connectivity through global trade networks. Invasion was strongly promoted by agricultural imports from countries in which the focal species was present and that were climatically similar to the importing country. However, live plant imports from nearby countries provided a better explanation of the most recent invasions. Connectivity through multiple trade networks predicted invasion better than total agricultural trade, and there was support for our hypothesis that species known to be transported with a particular network had greater sensitivity to its connectivity. Main conclusions Our findings show that patterns of invasion are governed to a large extent by global trade networks connecting source areas for non‐native species and the dispersal of those species through multiple trade networks. This enhances potential for developing a predictive framework to improve risk assessment, biosecurity and surveillance for invasions. |
DOI Link: | 10.1111/geb.12599 |
Rights: | The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. |
Licence URL(s): | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved |
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chapman_et_al-2017-Global_Ecology_and_Biogeography.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 2.79 MB | Adobe PDF | Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy |
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.