Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28643
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Daniel Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPurse, Bethan Ven_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Helen Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorBullock, James Men_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-30T01:01:39Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-30T01:01:39Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-31en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28643-
dc.description.abstractAim Although global trade is implicated in biological invasions, the assumption that trade networks explain the large‐scale distributions of non‐native species remains largely untested. We addressed this by analysing relationships between global trade networks and plant pest invasion. Location Forty‐eight countries in Europe and the Mediterranean. Time period Current. Major taxa studied Four hundred and twenty‐two non‐native plant pests (173 invertebrates, 166 pathogens, 83 plants). Methods Ten types of connectivity index were developed, representing potential roles of trade networks, air transport links, geographical proximity, climatic similarity and source country wealth in facilitating invasion. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) identified the connectivity index that best explained both historical and recent invasion. Then, more complex GLMMs were developed including connectivity through trade networks for multiple commodities relevant for pests (live plants, forest products, fruit and vegetables and seeds) and species’ transport associations with those commodities. Results Total import volumes, species’ global prevalence and connectivity measures based on air transport, geographical distance or climate did not explain invasion as well as connectivity through global trade networks. Invasion was strongly promoted by agricultural imports from countries in which the focal species was present and that were climatically similar to the importing country. However, live plant imports from nearby countries provided a better explanation of the most recent invasions. Connectivity through multiple trade networks predicted invasion better than total agricultural trade, and there was support for our hypothesis that species known to be transported with a particular network had greater sensitivity to its connectivity. Main conclusions Our findings show that patterns of invasion are governed to a large extent by global trade networks connecting source areas for non‐native species and the dispersal of those species through multiple trade networks. This enhances potential for developing a predictive framework to improve risk assessment, biosecurity and surveillance for invasions.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWileyen_UK
dc.relationChapman DS, Purse BV, Roy HE & Bullock JM (2017) Global trade networks determine the distribution of invasive non-native species. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26 (8), pp. 907-917. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12599en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectclimate matchingen_UK
dc.subjectcrop pestsen_UK
dc.subjectdispersalen_UK
dc.subjectintroductionen_UK
dc.subjectinvasive alien speciesen_UK
dc.subjectpest outbreaksen_UK
dc.subjectplant diseaseen_UK
dc.subjectplant healthen_UK
dc.subjecttransporten_UK
dc.titleGlobal trade networks determine the distribution of invasive non-native speciesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Chapman_et_al-2017-Global_Ecology_and_Biogeography.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/geb.12599en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleGlobal Ecology and Biogeographyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1466-8238en_UK
dc.citation.issn1466-822Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume26en_UK
dc.citation.issue8en_UK
dc.citation.spage907en_UK
dc.citation.epage917en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen_UK
dc.author.emaildaniel.chapman@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date20/06/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH)en_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000405190600006en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85021237535en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1066440en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1836-4112en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-04-16en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-04-16en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-01-28en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorChapman, Daniel S|0000-0003-1836-4112en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPurse, Bethan V|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoy, Helen E|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBullock, James M|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectNEC05100|Natural Environment Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2267-05-21en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameChapman_et_al-2017-Global_Ecology_and_Biogeography.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1466-822Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chapman_et_al-2017-Global_Ecology_and_Biogeography.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.79 MBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.