1. STORRE
  2. Faculty of Natural Sciences
  3. Psychology
  4. Psychology Journal Articles
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28539
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPoulin-Dubois, Dianeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRakoczy, Hannesen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBurnside, Kimberlyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCrivello, Cristinaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDörrenberg, Sebastianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Katherynen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKrist, Horsten_UK
dc.contributor.authorKulke, Louisaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLiszkowski, Ulfen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLow, Jasonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPerner, Josefen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPowell, Lindseyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPriewasser, Beateen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRafetseder, Evaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRuffman, Teden_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-17T15:34:11Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-17T15:34:11Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28539-
dc.description.abstractThe commentary by Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate raises a number of crucial issues concerning the replicability and validity of measures of false belief in infancy. Although we agree with some of their arguments, we believe that they underestimate the replication crisis in this area. In our response to their commentary, we first analyze the current empirical situation. The upshot is that, given the available evidence, it remains very much an open question whether infants possess a rich theory of mind. We then draw out more general conclusions for future collaborative studies that have the potential to address this open question.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationPoulin-Dubois D, Rakoczy H, Burnside K, Crivello C, Dörrenberg S, Edwards K, Krist H, Kulke L, Liszkowski U, Low J, Perner J, Powell L, Priewasser B, Rafetseder E & Ruffman T (2018) Do infants understand false beliefs? We don't know yet – A commentary on Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate's commentary. Commentary on: Baillargeon, R., Buttelmann, D., & Southgate, V. (2018). Invited Commentary: Interpreting failed replications of early false-belief findings: Methodological andtheoretical considerations. Cognitive Development, 46, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.06.001.. Cognitive Development, 48, pp. 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.09.005en_UK
dc.relation.isbasedonBaillargeon, R., Buttelmann, D., & Southgate, V. (2018). Invited Commentary: Interpreting failed replications of early false-belief findings: Methodological andtheoretical considerations. Cognitive Development, 46, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.06.001.en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.titleDo infants understand false beliefs? We don't know yet – A commentary on Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate's commentaryen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Poulin-Dubois_Rakoczy_et_al_reply_CogDev_2018.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.09.005en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleCognitive Developmenten_UK
dc.citation.issn0885-2014en_UK
dc.citation.volume48en_UK
dc.citation.spage302en_UK
dc.citation.epage315en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaileva.rafetseder@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date20/11/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationConcordia Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGeorg-August University Gottingenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationConcordia Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationConcordia Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hamburgen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationVictoria University of Wellingtonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationErnst Moritz Arndt University of Greifswalden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGeorg-August University Gottingenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hamburgen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationVictoria University of Wellingtonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Salzburgen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Salzburgen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Otagoen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000454375300029en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85056694457en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1067660en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9816-8607en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-09-26en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-09-26en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-01-11en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorPoulin-Dubois, Diane|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRakoczy, Hannes|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBurnside, Kimberly|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCrivello, Cristina|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDörrenberg, Sebastian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEdwards, Katheryn|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKrist, Horst|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKulke, Louisa|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLiszkowski, Ulf|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLow, Jason|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPerner, Josef|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPowell, Lindsey|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPriewasser, Beate|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRafetseder, Eva|0000-0002-9816-8607en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRuffman, Ted|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2268-10-21en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamePoulin-Dubois_Rakoczy_et_al_reply_CogDev_2018.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0885-2014en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Poulin-Dubois_Rakoczy_et_al_reply_CogDev_2018.pdfFulltext - Published Version442.19 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright

View License
Show simple item record


Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.