STORRE
STORRE: Stirling Online Research Repository
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28539| Appears in Collections: | Psychology Journal Articles |
| Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
| Title: | Do infants understand false beliefs? We don't know yet – A commentary on Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate's commentary |
| Author(s): | Poulin-Dubois, Diane Rakoczy, Hannes Burnside, Kimberly Crivello, Cristina Dörrenberg, Sebastian Edwards, Katheryn Krist, Horst Kulke, Louisa Liszkowski, Ulf Low, Jason Perner, Josef Powell, Lindsey Priewasser, Beate Rafetseder, Eva Ruffman, Ted |
| Contact Email: | eva.rafetseder@stir.ac.uk |
| Issue Date: | Dec-2018 |
| Date Deposited: | 11-Jan-2019 |
| Citation: | Poulin-Dubois D, Rakoczy H, Burnside K, Crivello C, Dörrenberg S, Edwards K, Krist H, Kulke L, Liszkowski U, Low J, Perner J, Powell L, Priewasser B, Rafetseder E & Ruffman T (2018) Do infants understand false beliefs? We don't know yet – A commentary on Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate's commentary. Commentary on: Baillargeon, R., Buttelmann, D., & Southgate, V. (2018). Invited Commentary: Interpreting failed replications of early false-belief findings: Methodological andtheoretical considerations. Cognitive Development, 46, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.06.001.. Cognitive Development, 48, pp. 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.09.005 |
| Abstract: | The commentary by Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate raises a number of crucial issues concerning the replicability and validity of measures of false belief in infancy. Although we agree with some of their arguments, we believe that they underestimate the replication crisis in this area. In our response to their commentary, we first analyze the current empirical situation. The upshot is that, given the available evidence, it remains very much an open question whether infants possess a rich theory of mind. We then draw out more general conclusions for future collaborative studies that have the potential to address this open question. |
| DOI Link: | 10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.09.005 |
| Rights: | The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. |
| Licence URL(s): | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved |
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poulin-Dubois_Rakoczy_et_al_reply_CogDev_2018.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 442.19 kB | Adobe PDF | Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy |
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.