Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26040
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Parental catastrophizing about children's pain and selective attention to varying levels of facial expression of pain in children: A dot-probe study
Author(s): Vervoort, Tine
Caes, Line
Crombez, Geert
Koster, Ernst
Van Damme, Stefaan
Dewitte, Marieke
Goubert, Liesbet
Contact Email: line.caes@stir.ac.uk
Issue Date: Aug-2011
Date Deposited: 25-Oct-2017
Citation: Vervoort T, Caes L, Crombez G, Koster E, Van Damme S, Dewitte M & Goubert L (2011) Parental catastrophizing about children's pain and selective attention to varying levels of facial expression of pain in children: A dot-probe study. Pain, 152 (8), pp. 1751-1757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.03.015
Abstract: The attentional demand of pain has primarily been investigated within an intrapersonal context. Little is known about observers' attentional processing of another's pain. The present study investigated, within a sample of parents (n = 65; 51 mothers, 14 fathers) of school children, parental selective attention to children's facial display of pain and the moderating role of child's facial expressiveness of pain and parental catastrophizing about their child's pain. Parents performed a dot-probe task in which child facial display of pain (of varying pain expressiveness) were presented. Findings provided evidence of parental selective attention to child pain displays. Low facial displays of pain appeared sufficiently and also, as compared with higher facial displays of pain, equally capable of engaging parents' attention to the location of threat. Severity of facial displays of pain had a nonspatial effect on attention; that is, there was increased interference (ie, delayed responding) with increasing facial expressiveness. This interference effect was particularly pronounced for high-catastrophizing parents, suggesting that being confronted with increasing child pain displays becomes particularly demanding for high-catastrophizing parents. Finally, parents with higher levels of catastrophizing increasingly attended away from low pain expressions, whereas selective attention to high-pain expressions did not differ between high-catastrophizing and low-catastrophizing parents. Theoretical implications and further research directions are discussed. Parental attentional processing of child pain is dependent on parental catastrophizing about the child's pain, child facial expressiveness of pain, and the interaction between the two. © 2011 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.03.015
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s): http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
00006396-201108000-00014.pdfFulltext - Published Version170.58 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-10    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.