Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26040
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVervoort, Tineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCaes, Lineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCrombez, Geerten_UK
dc.contributor.authorKoster, Ernsten_UK
dc.contributor.authorVan Damme, Stefaanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDewitte, Mariekeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoubert, Liesbeten_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-25T23:01:45Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-25T23:01:45Z-
dc.date.issued2011-08en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26040-
dc.description.abstractThe attentional demand of pain has primarily been investigated within an intrapersonal context. Little is known about observers' attentional processing of another's pain. The present study investigated, within a sample of parents (n = 65; 51 mothers, 14 fathers) of school children, parental selective attention to children's facial display of pain and the moderating role of child's facial expressiveness of pain and parental catastrophizing about their child's pain. Parents performed a dot-probe task in which child facial display of pain (of varying pain expressiveness) were presented. Findings provided evidence of parental selective attention to child pain displays. Low facial displays of pain appeared sufficiently and also, as compared with higher facial displays of pain, equally capable of engaging parents' attention to the location of threat. Severity of facial displays of pain had a nonspatial effect on attention; that is, there was increased interference (ie, delayed responding) with increasing facial expressiveness. This interference effect was particularly pronounced for high-catastrophizing parents, suggesting that being confronted with increasing child pain displays becomes particularly demanding for high-catastrophizing parents. Finally, parents with higher levels of catastrophizing increasingly attended away from low pain expressions, whereas selective attention to high-pain expressions did not differ between high-catastrophizing and low-catastrophizing parents. Theoretical implications and further research directions are discussed. Parental attentional processing of child pain is dependent on parental catastrophizing about the child's pain, child facial expressiveness of pain, and the interaction between the two. © 2011 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier for International Association for the Study of Painen_UK
dc.relationVervoort T, Caes L, Crombez G, Koster E, Van Damme S, Dewitte M & Goubert L (2011) Parental catastrophizing about children's pain and selective attention to varying levels of facial expression of pain in children: A dot-probe study. Pain, 152 (8), pp. 1751-1757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.03.015en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.titleParental catastrophizing about children's pain and selective attention to varying levels of facial expression of pain in children: A dot-probe studyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-10en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[00006396-201108000-00014.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pain.2011.03.015en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid21481531en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePAINen_UK
dc.citation.issn1872-6623en_UK
dc.citation.issn0304-3959en_UK
dc.citation.volume152en_UK
dc.citation.issue8en_UK
dc.citation.spage1751en_UK
dc.citation.epage1757en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailline.caes@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date09/04/2011en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000292862400014en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-79960463309en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid559056en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
dc.date.accepted2011-03-10en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-03-10en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-10-25en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorVervoort, Tine|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCaes, Line|0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCrombez, Geert|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKoster, Ernst|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVan Damme, Stefaan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDewitte, Marieke|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoubert, Liesbet|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-10en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filename00006396-201108000-00014.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0304-3959en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
00006396-201108000-00014.pdfFulltext - Published Version170.58 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-10    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.