|Appears in Collections:||Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Dissent at Work and the Resistance Debate: Departures, Directions, and Dead Ends|
|Citation:||Thompson P (2016) Dissent at Work and the Resistance Debate: Departures, Directions, and Dead Ends. Studies in Political Economy, 97 (2), pp. 106-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2016.1207331|
|Abstract:||The primary purpose of this article is to review what has become ‘the resistance debate’ among critical scholars of work and organization, and to extract from that theory and practice some assessment of contemporary dissenting behaviours in the workplace. While criticizing tendencies to see resistance as nowhere or everywhere, the article evaluates the impact that changes in managerial regimes have on traditional oppositional practices and discusses the new spaces for innovative labour agency.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Studies in Political Economy on 02 Aug 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/07078552.2016.1207331|
|ThompsonJ Dissent paper for SPE final.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||586.06 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.