Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22770
Appears in Collections: | Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | The dynamics of global visual effects and games development industries: lessons for Australia’s creative industries development policy |
Author(s): | Parker, Rachel Cox, Stephen Thompson, Paul |
Contact Email: | paul.thompson@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | digital visual effects games developers film industry industry bottlenecks economic governance |
Issue Date: | 2017 |
Date Deposited: | 22-Jan-2016 |
Citation: | Parker R, Cox S & Thompson P (2017) The dynamics of global visual effects and games development industries: lessons for Australia’s creative industries development policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23 (4), pp. 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1064118 |
Abstract: | The paper critiques the focus of creative industries policy on capability developmentof small and medium sized firms and the provision of regional incentives.It analyses factors affecting the competitiveness and sustainability of the gamesdevelopment industry and visual effects suppliers to feature films. Interviewswith participants in these industries highlight the need for policy instruments totake into consideration the structure and organization of global markets and thepower of lead multinational corporations. We show that although forms of economicgovernance in these industries may allow sustainable value capture, theyare interrupted by bottlenecks in which ferocious competition among suppliersis confronted by comparatively little competition among the lead firms. Weargue that current approaches to creative industries policy aimed at buildingself-sustaining creative industries are unlikely to be sufficient because of theglobalized nature of the industries. Rather, we argue that a more profitableapproach is likely to require supporting diversification of the industries as‘feeders’ into other areas of the economy. |
DOI Link: | 10.1080/10286632.2015.1064118 |
Rights: | This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in International Journal of Cultural Policy on 24 Jul 2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10286632.2015.1064118 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Parker Cox Thompson 2015 accepted version.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 441.28 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.