Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7189
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The value of uncropped field margins for foraging bumblebees
Author(s): Kells, Andrea R
Holland, John
Goulson, Dave
Contact Email: dave.goulson@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Agriculture
Apis mellifera
Bombus
Floral resources
Naturally regenerated field margin
Issue Date: Dec-2001
Date Deposited: 2-Aug-2012
Citation: Kells AR, Holland J & Goulson D (2001) The value of uncropped field margins for foraging bumblebees. Journal of Insect Conservation, 5 (4), pp. 283-291. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=yv4JPVwI&eid=2-s2.0-0035703419&md5=54613093fa8ca564ae2c06c51083d750; https://doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1013307822575
Abstract: The intensification of agriculture has led to declines in species diversity and abundance within groups of certain flora and fauna. Bumblebees (Bombus spp.) are one group where a decline has been documented, and it is thought to be attributable to a decrease in forage resources and potential nest sites. As bumblebees play an important role in the pollination of many entomophilous crops, this decline could impact on agricultural productivity. We examined the role of naturally regenerated field margins in providing forage plants on land where nectar resources are otherwise impoverished. The following question was addressed - Are naturally regenerated unsprayed field margins more attractive to foraging bumblebees and honeybees than cropped field margins managed as conservation headlands? Significantly more bees visited naturally regenerated field margins than cropped field margins. Honeybees (Apis mellifera), Bombus terrestris, and Bombus lapidarius were the most commonly observed bee species. Different wildflower species within the naturally regenerated margins varied greatly in relative number of visits received, and bumblebee species were found to prefer different flower species to honeybees. The potential role that naturally regenerated field margins could play in the conservation of bumblebee species, and the implications for other species of flora and fauna, are discussed.
URL: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=yv4JPVwI&eid=2-s2.0-0035703419&md5=54613093fa8ca564ae2c06c51083d750
DOI Link: 10.1023/A:1013307822575
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s): http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kells_Value_of_uncropped_field_margins_2001.pdfFulltext - Published Version218.53 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.