Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7189
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKells, Andrea Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorHolland, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoulson, Daveen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-02T23:15:51Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-02T23:15:51Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2001-12en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/7189-
dc.description.abstractThe intensification of agriculture has led to declines in species diversity and abundance within groups of certain flora and fauna. Bumblebees (Bombus spp.) are one group where a decline has been documented, and it is thought to be attributable to a decrease in forage resources and potential nest sites. As bumblebees play an important role in the pollination of many entomophilous crops, this decline could impact on agricultural productivity. We examined the role of naturally regenerated field margins in providing forage plants on land where nectar resources are otherwise impoverished. The following question was addressed - Are naturally regenerated unsprayed field margins more attractive to foraging bumblebees and honeybees than cropped field margins managed as conservation headlands? Significantly more bees visited naturally regenerated field margins than cropped field margins. Honeybees (Apis mellifera), Bombus terrestris, and Bombus lapidarius were the most commonly observed bee species. Different wildflower species within the naturally regenerated margins varied greatly in relative number of visits received, and bumblebee species were found to prefer different flower species to honeybees. The potential role that naturally regenerated field margins could play in the conservation of bumblebee species, and the implications for other species of flora and fauna, are discussed.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishersen_UK
dc.relationKells AR, Holland J & Goulson D (2001) The value of uncropped field margins for foraging bumblebees. Journal of Insect Conservation, 5 (4), pp. 283-291. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=yv4JPVwI&eid=2-s2.0-0035703419&md5=54613093fa8ca564ae2c06c51083d750; https://doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1013307822575en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectAgricultureen_UK
dc.subjectApis melliferaen_UK
dc.subjectBombusen_UK
dc.subjectFloral resourcesen_UK
dc.subjectNaturally regenerated field marginen_UK
dc.titleThe value of uncropped field margins for foraging bumblebeesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Kells_Value_of_uncropped_field_margins_2001.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1023/A:1013307822575en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Insect Conservationen_UK
dc.citation.issn1572-9753en_UK
dc.citation.issn1366-638Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume5en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage283en_UK
dc.citation.epage291en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=yv4JPVwI&eid=2-s2.0-0035703419&md5=54613093fa8ca564ae2c06c51083d750en_UK
dc.author.emaildave.goulson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Southamptonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe Game and Wildlife Conservation Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-0035703419en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid785788en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2001-12-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-08-02en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorKells, Andrea R|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHolland, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoulson, Dave|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameKells_Value_of_uncropped_field_margins_2001.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1366-638Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kells_Value_of_uncropped_field_margins_2001.pdfFulltext - Published Version218.53 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.