|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Did the Popsicle Melt? Preschoolers’ Performance in an Episodic-like Memory Task (Forthcoming/Available Online)|
Atance, Cristina M
|Citation:||Martin-Ordas G, Atance CM & Caza J (2017) Did the Popsicle Melt? Preschoolers’ Performance in an Episodic-like Memory Task (Forthcoming/Available Online), Memory.|
|Abstract:||Episodic memory has been tested in non-human animals using depletion paradigms that assess recollection for the “what,” “where” and “when” (i.e., how long ago). This paradigm has not been used with human children, yet doing so would provide another means to explore their episodic memory development. Using a depletion paradigm, preschool-aged children were presented in two trials with a preferred food that was only edible after a short interval and a less preferred food that was edible after the short and long intervals. Younger (mean= 40 months) and older (mean=65 months) children tended to choose their preferred food after the short intervals, but did not switch to selecting their less-preferred food after the long intervals. Importantly, their choices did not differ with age. Although older children better remembered “what”, “where” and “what is where” than did younger children, neither age group successfully estimated “how long ago” an event occurred. Finally, both age groups spontaneously recalled information about Trial 1. We also analyzed the relation between the different measures used in the study but no clear patterns emerged. Results are discussed with respect to the cognitive mechanisms necessary to succeed in depletion paradigms and the measurement of episodic memory more broadly.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Memory on 16 Feb 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09658211.2017.1285940|
|ms_18_01_17_FV.pdf||388.77 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 16/2/2018 Request a copy|
|Figure 1.pptx||17.05 MB||Unknown||Under Embargo until 16/2/2018 Request a copy|
|Figure 2_18_01_17.pptx||131.69 kB||Unknown||Under Embargo until 16/2/2018 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.