Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/9966
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKuchta, Romanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorShinn, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHanzelova, Vladimiraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorScholz, Tomasen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-08T19:51:27Z-
dc.date.available2013-06-08T19:51:27Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2006-04en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/9966-
dc.description.abstractFreshly released eggs from four species of the cestode Eubothrium (Eubothrium crassum, Eubothrium fragile, Eubothrium rugosum, and Eubothrium salvelini) were subjected to morphological and morphometric analysis. The eggs of the two freshwater species, E. rugosum and E. salvelini, were ovoid with a lobed embryophore whereas the eggs of the two marine species, E. crassum and E. fragile, were more circular with a smooth embryophore. However, the morphological differences between species were not readily evident to permit their clear distinction from one another. To discriminate species, a forward stepwise linear discriminant analysis, using six of the seven measured metric characters made on the eggs, was used, which gave 100% correct classification of two species, E. rugosum and E. salvelini, and a high proportion of correct classification for E. crassum (98%) and E. fragile (83%). Of the latter two species, one specimen of E. crassum and five specimens of E. fragile were misclassified between the respective groups. The principal characters used in the classification of the species were the width of the egg, the length of the mediolateral hooks, and the width of the oncosphere. To provide more information on the life cycle of each species, the eggs were used in a series of infection trials to identify appropriate intermediate hosts. Experimental infections with freshwater copepods were successful when exposed to the eggs of E. salvelini, partially successful when exposed to the eggs of marine E. crassum with 10% of the copepods becoming infected, but no infections were obtained when the eggs of E. fragile were used.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationKuchta R, Shinn A, Hanzelova V & Scholz T (2006) A comparative study of the egg morphology of four species of Eubothrium (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) with comments on their early development. Invertebrate Biology, 125 (1), pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7410.2006.00034.xen_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectEubothrium fragileen_UK
dc.subjectEubothrium crassumen_UK
dc.subjectEubothrium rugosumen_UK
dc.subjectEubothrium salvelinien_UK
dc.subjectfish parasitesen_UK
dc.titleA comparative study of the egg morphology of four species of Eubothrium (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) with comments on their early developmenten_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Kuchta et al Invert Biol 2006.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1744-7410.2006.00034.xen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleInvertebrate Biologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1744-7410en_UK
dc.citation.issn1077-8306en_UK
dc.citation.volume125en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage1en_UK
dc.citation.epage8en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailaps1@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCzech Academy of Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSlovak Academy of Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCzech Academy of Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000236606800001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-33645725340en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid753647en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5434-2685en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2006-04-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-11-19en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorKuchta, Roman|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorShinn, Andrew|0000-0002-5434-2685en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHanzelova, Vladimira|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorScholz, Tomas|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameKuchta et al Invert Biol 2006.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1077-8306en_UK
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kuchta et al Invert Biol 2006.pdfFulltext - Published Version727.9 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.