Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/9202
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Carroll, Ronanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Eamonnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Peter Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Leeen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-25T23:12:32Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-25T23:12:32Z-
dc.date.issued2012-03-08en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/9202-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Throughout the world there is an insufficient supply of donor organs to meet the demand for organ transplantations. This paper presents a protocol for a randomised controlled trial, testing whether a simple, theory-based anticipated regret manipulation leads to a significant increase in posthumous organ donor registrations. Methods: We will use a between-groups, prospective randomised controlled design. A random sample of 14,520 members of the adult Scottish general public will be contacted via post. These participants will be randomly allocated into 1 of the 4 conditions. The no questionnaire control (NQC) group will simply receive a letter and donor registration form. The questionnaire control (QC) arm will receive a questionnaire measuring their emotions and non-cognitive affective attitudes towards organ donation. The theory of planned behavior (TPB) group will complete the emotions and affective attitudes questionnaire plus additional items assessing their cognitive attitudes towards organ donation, perceived control over registration and how they think significant others view this action. Finally, the anticipated regret (AR) group will complete the same indices as the TPB group, plus two additional anticipated regret items. These items will assess the extent to which the participant anticipates regret for not registering as an organ donor in the near future. The outcome variable will be NHS Blood and Transplant verified registrations as an organ donor within 6 months of receiving our postal intervention. Discussion: This study will assess whether simply asking people to reflect on the extent to which they may anticipate regret for not registering as an organ donor increases organ donor registration 6 months later. If successful, this simple and easy to administer theory-based intervention has the potential to save lives and money for the NHS by reducing the number of people receiving treatments such as dialysis. This intervention may also be incorporated into future organ donor campaigns.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_UK
dc.relationO'Carroll R, Ferguson E, Hayes PC & Shepherd L (2012) Increasing organ donation via anticipated regret (INORDAR): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 12, p. Article 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-169en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:169 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-169en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/en_UK
dc.subjectDonation of organs, tissues, etc.en_UK
dc.subjectTransplantation of organs, tissues, etc.en_UK
dc.subjectOrgan donors Scotlanden_UK
dc.subjectRegreten_UK
dc.titleIncreasing organ donation via anticipated regret (INORDAR): protocol for a randomised controlled trialen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2458-12-169en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Public Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1471-2458en_UK
dc.citation.volume12en_UK
dc.citation.spageArticle 169en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailronan.ocarroll@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRoyal Infirmary of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000302566200001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84857958506en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid765159en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5130-291Xen_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-03-08en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-09-24en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorO'Carroll, Ronan|0000-0002-5130-291Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorFerguson, Eamonn|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHayes, Peter C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorShepherd, Lee|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2012-09-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/|2012-09-24|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameocarroll_BMCPH_2012.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ocarroll_BMCPH_2012.pdfFulltext - Published Version511.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.