Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/9197
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Carroll, Ronanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFoster, Catherineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcGeechan, Granten_UK
dc.contributor.authorSandford, Kayleighen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Eamonnen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-19T22:20:09Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-19T22:20:09Z-
dc.date.issued2011-03en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/9197-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This research tested the role of traditional rational-cognitive factors and emotional barriers to posthumous organ donation. An example of an emotional barrier is the "ick" factor, a basic disgust reaction to the idea of organ donation. We also tested the potential role of manipulating anticipated regret to increase intention to donate in people who are not yet registered organ donors. Design: In three experiments involving 621 members of the United Kingdom general public, participants were invited to complete questionnaire measures tapping potential emotional affective attitude barriers such as the "ick" factor, the desire to retain bodily integrity after death, and medical mistrust. Registered posthumous organ donors were compared with nondonors. In Experiments 2 and 3, nondonors were then allocated to a simple anticipated regret manipulation versus a control condition, and the impact on intention to donate was tested. Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported emotional barriers and intention to donate in the future. Results: Traditional rational-cognitive factors such as knowledge, attitude, and subjective norm failed to distinguish donors from nondonors. However, in all three experiments, nondonors scored significantly higher than donors on the emotional "ick" factor and bodily integrity scales. A simple anticipated regret manipulation led to a significant increase in intention to register as an organ donor in future. Conclusions: Negative affective attitudes are thus crucial barriers to people registering as organ donors. A simple anticipated regret manipulation has the potential to significantly increase organ donation rates.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen_UK
dc.relationO'Carroll R, Foster C, McGeechan G, Sandford K & Ferguson E (2011) The "Ick" Factor, Anticipated Regret, and Willingness to Become an Organ Donor. Health Psychology, 30 (2), pp. 236-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022379en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectorgan, donor, donation, disgust, posthumousen_UK
dc.subjectDonation of organs, tissues, etc.en_UK
dc.subjectTransplantation of organs, tissues, etc.en_UK
dc.subjectOrgan donors Great Britainen_UK
dc.subjectRegreten_UK
dc.titleThe "Ick" Factor, Anticipated Regret, and Willingness to Become an Organ Donoren_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[ocarroll_HP_2011.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/a0022379en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid21401258en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleHealth Psychologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1930-7810en_UK
dc.citation.issn0278-6133en_UK
dc.citation.volume30en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage236en_UK
dc.citation.epage245en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailronan.ocarroll@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000288418200015en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-79952842501en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid889717en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5130-291Xen_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-03-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-09-24en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorO'Carroll, Ronan|0000-0002-5130-291Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorFoster, Catherine|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcGeechan, Grant|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSandford, Kayleigh|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFerguson, Eamonn|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameocarroll_HP_2011.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0278-6133en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ocarroll_HP_2011.pdfFulltext - Published Version112.74 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.