|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Living liver donation: Attitudes of the general public and general practitioners in Scotland|
|Author(s):||McGregor, Lesley M|
Hayes, Peter C
|Keywords:||liver, transplant, living donation, attitudes|
|Citation:||McGregor LM, Hayes PC & O'Carroll R (2008) Living liver donation: Attitudes of the general public and general practitioners in Scotland, Abingdon, England, Psychology and Health, 23 (5), pp. 603-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440701864512.|
|Abstract:||In April 2006, the Scottish Liver Transplant Unit in Edinburgh became the first NHS transplant unit in the UK to offer adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This procedure allows a healthy individual to donate part of their liver to someone with end-stage liver disease. With donations from the deceased in short supply, this procedure has the capacity to save lives. The aim of this study was to explore the attitudes of the general public and general practitioners (GPs) towards LDLT, before its implementation. A total of 1041 members of the Scottish general public and 155 GPs working in Scotland completed a short questionnaire devised for this study. The majority of participants supported the option of LDLT, but frequency counts showed that only 34% of the general public wish to donate their organs following death compared to 85% of GPs. With regards to an acceptable risk of death before volunteering to donate, 25% of GPs would accept a 1 in 20 risk of death, whereas 50% of the general public either could not make a decision or selected 'No risk'. The question of how well people understand the concept of risk was again highlighted in this study.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|ocarroll_PH_2008.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||104.87 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 2999-12-01 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.