Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/8697
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPotter, Lauren Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorGrealy, Madeleine Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Roryen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-18T23:26:34Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-18T23:26:34Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2009-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/8697-
dc.description.abstractCurrent measures assessing older adults' functional ability detect existing limitations on essential tasks rather than changes in other aspects of functioning that could indicate future limitations. The perceived motor-efficacy scale was developed to measure capability beliefs of healthy older adults across a range of daily action tasks. Subscales were developed through interviews with older volunteers and academics, then administered to participants aged 60-96 (N = 300). Factor analysis of subscale scores produced 10 subscales. These demonstrated strong internal reliability, which was replicated with a second sample aged 60-92 (N = 167). The influence of perceived motor-efficacy on performance of cognitively demanding action tasks was investigated with a third sample aged 60-88 (N = 134). On a task assessing the inhibition of an inappropriate action, older adults in their 80s with high confidence produced minor errors, whereas those with lower confidence produced extreme errors. On another task assessing the ability to inhibit a previously learnt action, those with high levels of perceived motor-efficacy performed better amongst those least able to inhibit, but more poorly among those most able. Perceived motor-efficacy may therefore be useful in identifying older adults at risk of functional limitations and enabling interventions before the onset of illness.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBritish Psychological Societyen_UK
dc.relationPotter LM, Grealy MA & O'Connor R (2009) Healthy ageing, perceived motor-efficacy, and performance on cognitively demanding action tasks. British Journal of Psychology, 100 (1), pp. 49-70. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X304478en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subject10en_UK
dc.subject300en_UK
dc.subject80en_UK
dc.subjectABILITYen_UK
dc.subjectacademicsen_UK
dc.subjectAdulten_UK
dc.subjectAdultsen_UK
dc.subjectAgeden_UK
dc.subjectanalysisen_UK
dc.subjectat risken_UK
dc.subjectBELIEFen_UK
dc.subjectbeliefsen_UK
dc.subjectCONFIDENCEen_UK
dc.subjectERRORen_UK
dc.subjectERRORSen_UK
dc.subjectfactor analysisen_UK
dc.subjectfunctioningen_UK
dc.subjectFutureen_UK
dc.subjectILLNESSen_UK
dc.subjectINHIBITIONen_UK
dc.subjectInterventionen_UK
dc.subjectInterventionsen_UK
dc.subjectInterviewen_UK
dc.subjectInterviewsen_UK
dc.subjectLEVELen_UK
dc.subjectlevelsen_UK
dc.subjectLIMITATIONSen_UK
dc.subjectolder adultsen_UK
dc.subjectotheren_UK
dc.subjectPARTICIPANTSen_UK
dc.subjectPerformanceen_UK
dc.subjectRANGEen_UK
dc.subjectrisken_UK
dc.subjectSAMPLEen_UK
dc.subjectSCALEen_UK
dc.subjectTASKen_UK
dc.titleHealthy ageing, perceived motor-efficacy, and performance on cognitively demanding action tasksen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-29en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[potteretal_BJP_2009.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1348/000712608X304478en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBritish Journal of Psychologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn2044-8295en_UK
dc.citation.issn0007-1269en_UK
dc.citation.volume100en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage49en_UK
dc.citation.epage70en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailrory.oconnor@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHeriot-Watt Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Strathclydeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000263903100006en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-61449149404en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid800500en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2009-02-28en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-08-31en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorPotter, Lauren M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGrealy, Madeleine A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorO'Connor, Rory|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamepotteretal_BJP_2009.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0007-1269en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
potteretal_BJP_2009.pdfFulltext - Published Version180.18 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-29    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.