Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/827
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Anthonyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJones, Benedict Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDeBruine, Lisa Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorFeinberg, David Ren_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-19T23:14:18Z-
dc.date.available2013-12-19T23:14:18Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/827-
dc.description.abstractSymmetry and masculinity in human faces have been proposed to be cues to the quality of the owner. Accordingly, symmetry is generally found attractive in male and female faces and femininity is attractive in female faces. Women’s preferences for male facial masculinity vary in ways that may maximise genetic benefits to women’s offspring. Here we examine same- and opposite-sex preferences for both traits (Study 1) and intercorrelations between preferences for symmetry and sexual dimorphism in faces (Study 1, Study 2) using computer manipulated faces. For symmetry, we found that male and female judges preferred symmetric faces more when judging faces of the opposite-sex than when judging same-sex faces. A similar pattern was seen for sexual dimorphism (i.e. women preferred more masculine male faces than men did), but women also showed stronger preferences for femininity in female faces than men reported. This suggests that women are more concerned with female femininity than are men. We also found that in women preferences for symmetry were positively correlated with preferences for masculinity in male faces and that in men preferences for symmetry were positively correlated with preferences for femininity in female faces. These latter findings suggest that symmetry and sexual dimorphism advertise a common quality in faces or that preferences for these facial cues are dependent on a common quality in the judges. Collectively, our findings support the view that preferences for symmetry and sexual dimorphism are related to mechanisms involved in sexual selection and mate choice rather than functionless by-products of other perceptual mechanisms.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOxford Journals, Oxford University Pressen_UK
dc.relationLittle A, Jones BC, DeBruine LM & Feinberg DR (2008) Symmetry and sexual dimorphism in human faces: interrelated preferences suggest both signal quality. Behavioral Ecology, 19 (4), pp. 902-908. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn049en_UK
dc.rightsPublished in Behavioral Ecology by Oxford Journals, Oxford University Press. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Behavioral Ecology following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(4):902-908 is available online at: http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/902.en_UK
dc.subjectfacesen_UK
dc.subjectsymmetryen_UK
dc.subjectmasculinityen_UK
dc.subjectattractivenessen_UK
dc.subjectFace Anatomyen_UK
dc.subjectSex differences (Psychology)en_UK
dc.subjectmasculinityen_UK
dc.subjectSexual attractionen_UK
dc.subjectfaceen_UK
dc.titleSymmetry and sexual dimorphism in human faces: interrelated preferences suggest both signal qualityen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2010-05-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Little_interrelate_final.pdf] Publisher requires a 12 month embargoen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/beheco/arn049en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBehavioral Ecologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1465-7279en_UK
dc.citation.issn1045-2249en_UK
dc.citation.volume19en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage902en_UK
dc.citation.epage908en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailanthony.little@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMcMaster Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000257786700029en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-47649092302en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid810681en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2008-12-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2009-02-20en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorLittle, Anthony|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJones, Benedict C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDeBruine, Lisa M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFeinberg, David R|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2010-05-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2010-04-30en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2010-05-01|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameLittle_interrelate_final.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1045-2249en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Little_interrelate_final.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version146.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.