Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/813
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBussiere, Lucen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGwynne, Darryl Ten_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, Roberten_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-09T04:50:36Z-
dc.date.available2013-06-09T04:50:36Z-
dc.date.issued2008-11en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/813-
dc.description.abstractSex-specific ornamentation is widely known among male animals, but even among sex-role reversed species, ornamented females are rare. Although several hypotheses for this pattern exist, too few systems featuring female ornaments have been studied in detail to adequately test them. Empidine dance flies are exceptional in that many species show female ornamentation of wings, abdomens, or legs. Here we compare sexual selection in males and females of the long-tailed dance fly, Rhamphomyia longicauda Loew (Diptera: Empididae), a sex-role reversed fly in which swarming females aggregate in competition for the nuptial gifts provided by males during mating. Females in this species possess several secondary sex characters, including eversible abdominal sacs, enlarged wings, and decorated tibiae that may all function in mate attraction during swarming. Males preferentially approach large females in the swarm, but the strength and shape of selection on females and the degree to which selection is sex-specific are unknown. We estimated linear and nonlinear sexual selection on structures expressed in both male and female flies, and found contrasting patterns of sexual selection on wing length and tibia length in males and females. In females, long wings and short tibiae were associated with mating success, whereas selection on males was significantly different: males with short wings and long tibiae were most likely to mate (although tibia length was a marginally non-significant predictor of male mating success). We found no evidence for assortative or disassortative mating. Although the largest females occupied positions within the swarm closest to the entry point for choosy males, in contrast to selection for mating success these females tended to have larger tibiae than rivals. We discuss our findings in the context of the mating biology of R. longicauda compared to other empidine dance flies, and its relevance to the evolution of sexual dimorphism in general.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing (for European Society for Evolutionary Biology)en_UK
dc.relationBussiere L, Gwynne DT & Brooks R (2008) Contrasting sexual selection on males and females in a role-reversed swarming dance-fly, Rhamphomyia longicauda Loew (Diptera: Empididae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21 (6), pp. 1683-1691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01580.xen_UK
dc.rightsPublished in Journal of Evolutionary Biology by Blackwell Publishing. The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.comen_UK
dc.subjectCourtship in animalsen_UK
dc.subjectSexual dimorphism (Animals)en_UK
dc.subjectEvolution (Biology)en_UK
dc.subjectSexual selection in animalsen_UK
dc.titleContrasting sexual selection on males and females in a role-reversed swarming dance-fly, Rhamphomyia longicauda Loew (Diptera: Empididae)en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01580.xen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Evolutionary Biologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1420-9101en_UK
dc.citation.issn1010-061Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume21en_UK
dc.citation.issue6en_UK
dc.citation.spage1683en_UK
dc.citation.epage1691en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailluc.bussiere@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Torontoen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of New South Walesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000260108900022en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-54049107818en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid834123en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8937-8381en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2008-11-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2009-02-17en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBussiere, Luc|0000-0001-8937-8381en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGwynne, Darryl T|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrooks, Robert|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2009-02-17en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2009-02-17|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameFlySelectionMSJEB2.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1010-061Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FlySelectionMSJEB2.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version404.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.