|Appears in Collections:||Economics Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Steam versus coking coal and the acid rain program|
|Citation:||Lange I (2010) Steam versus coking coal and the acid rain program. Energy Policy, 38 (3), pp. 1251-1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.045|
|Abstract:||The Clean Air Act of 1990 initiated a tradable permit program for emissions of sulfur dioxide from coal-fired power plants. One effect of this policy was a large increase in the consumption of low-sulfur bituminous coal by coal-fired power plants. However, low-sulfur bituminous coal is also the ideal coking coal for steel production. The analysis presented here will attempt to determine how the market responded to the increased consumption of low-sulfur bituminous coal by the electricity generation sector. Was there a decrease in the quality and/or quantity of coking coal consumption or did extraction increase? Most evidence suggests that the market for coking coal was unaffected, even as the extraction and consumption of low-sulfur bituminous coal for electricity generation increased substantially.|
|Rights:||Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Energy Policy by Elsevier. The original publication is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.045|
|EP_Lange_revisionII.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||267.07 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.