Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Computing Science and Mathematics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Mountain hares, louping-ill, red grouse and harvesting: complex interactions but few data
Author(s): Laurenson, M Karen
Norman, Rachel
Gilbert, Lucy
Reid, Hugh W
Hudson, Peter J
Contact Email:
Keywords: control policy
Cyprinus carpio
disease control
fishery management
import restrictions
pathogen spread
Issue Date: Jul-2004
Date Deposited: 22-Aug-2012
Citation: Laurenson MK, Norman R, Gilbert L, Reid HW & Hudson PJ (2004) Mountain hares, louping-ill, red grouse and harvesting: complex interactions but few data. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73 (4), pp. 811-813.;
Abstract: First paragraph: Our recent paper examined the impact of a large-scale field manipulation of mountain hare density on the dynamics of ticks, louping-ill and red grouse (Laurenson et al. 2003). We found that hares were an important host for ticks and for the transmission of louping-ill, and that tick burdens and louping-ill seroprevalence in grouse declined when hare densities were reduced, in comparison to a control. In addition, the number of young grouse produced per adult bird increased, but no effect on grouse density was found. Our model of the system showed that the dynamical decline in louping-ill can be accounted for through the decline of both ticks and the process of non-viraemic transmission. Cope, Iason & Gordon (2004) make two broad sets of observations on this study. First, they comment on the limitations of the controls. Secondly, they make minor modifications to an existing model of nematode-driven grouse cycles, replicating previously published research (Hudson et al.2002) and use it to confirm the same finding that louping-ill virus may be expected to dampen grouse cycles. Combined, the authors use these observations to argue that a policy of reducing mountain hare density to keep grouse moors economically viable has not been proven and go on to imply that louping-ill may even improve the economics of grouse harvesting.
DOI Link: 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00851.x
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
j.1365-2664.2010.01926.x.pdfFulltext - Published Version399.08 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.