|Appears in Collections:||Aquaculture Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Periphyton-based pond polyculture system: a bioeconomic comparison of on-farm and on-station trials|
|Author(s):||Azim, Mohammed Ekram|
Rahman, M Mustafizur
Wahab, Mohammed Abdul
Little, David Colin
|Citation:||Azim ME, Rahman MM, Wahab MA, Asaeda T, Little DC & Verdegem M (2004) Periphyton-based pond polyculture system: a bioeconomic comparison of on-farm and on-station trials. Aquaculture, 242 (1-4), pp. 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.09.008|
|Abstract:||A bioeconomic study of periphyton-based aquaculture in Bangladesh was carried out through comparison of on-farm and on-station trials. Five treatments, three on-farm and two on-station, each with four replications, were tried in a completely randomized design: on-farm control without substrate or feed (control), on-farm bamboo substrate only (treatment B-farm), on-farm substrate plus feed (BF-farm), on-station substrate only (B-station) and on-station substrate plus feed (BF-station). All ponds were stocked with three native major carps, rohu (Labeo rohita), catla (Catla catla) and mrigal (Cirrhinus mrigala) at a ratio of 60:40:15 and a stocking density of 11,500 juveniles ha−1. All ponds were fertilized fortnightly with urea and triple super phosphate (TSP) at the same rate of 50 kg ha−1. In substrate treatments, ponds were provided with bamboo poles as periphyton substrates. In fed treatments, rice bran and mustard oil cake (ratio 2:1 by weight) were applied. The environmental conditions of on-station ponds were better than on-farm ponds. Under on-farm condition, substrate plus feed (BF-farm) and substrate only (B-farm), respectively, resulted in 59% and 28% higher production over control. Under on-station condition, supplemental feed did not contribute significantly to the total fish production. However, on-station trial resulted in 77% higher combined net yield than on-farm trial. The cost–benefit analysis indicated that well-managed periphyton-based aquaculture practices might be a profitable business. The sustainability issues of this novel technology needs to be carefully assessed during the design and planning of aquacultural developmental efforts.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|littled_periphyton-basedpondpolyculture_2004.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||366.73 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 2999-12-21 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.