Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7405
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBhujel, Ram Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorYakupitiyage, Amararatneen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Warren Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLittle, David Cen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-10T10:55:21Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-10T10:55:21Z-
dc.date.issued2001-03-15en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/7405-
dc.description.abstractA 95-day trial was conducted on a commercial farm in Thailand to compare the performance of three locally available feeds on the seed production of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Three hundred and sixty female Nile tilapia (mean weight±SE, 91.5±2.3 g) with the same numbers of male (123.4±2.1 g) were stocked in each of 12 large nylon hapas suspended in two fertilized earthen ponds. An estimated 16 million eggs and yolk-sac fry were collected from the mouths of incubating females using hand nets at 5-day intervals. Broodfish were fed near to satiation twice daily. The female groups fed with large and small catfish pellets produced 27% and 30% more (P less than 0.05) seed, respectively, as compared to those females that were fed a herbivorous diet. Seed outputs from the catfish pellet-fed fish were 138±6 and 141±5 seed m−2 day−1, respectively, while that from herbivorous feed was 108±2 seed m−2 day−1. Broodfish consumed the small catfish pellets more readily than the large catfish pellets and grew faster on this diet. These results showed that excess energy enhanced somatic growth rather than the reproductive output of the fish. The number of seed per gram of feed was significantly higher (P less than 0.05), which resulted in the lowest production cost when the females were fed with the large catfish pellets as compared to the females that received the smaller catfish pellets and the herbivorous feed. Overall seed yield and the clutches started to decline after the second month of the experimental period regardless of the type of feed given, showing quadratic relations. It indicated that an appropriate feed with a sound feeding strategy is required to minimize hapa fouling and maintain good water quality, and thereby produce high seed yield for longer periods.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationBhujel RC, Yakupitiyage A, Turner WA & Little DC (2001) Selection of a commercial feed for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) broodfish breeding in a hapa-in-pond system. Aquaculture, 194 (3-4), pp. 303-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486%2800%2900521-4en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectNile tilapiaen_UK
dc.subjectseed productionen_UK
dc.subjecthapa-in ponden_UK
dc.subjectfeed selectionen_UK
dc.subjectfeed qualityen_UK
dc.titleSelection of a commercial feed for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) broodfish breeding in a hapa-in-pond systemen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-16en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[littled_aquacultureresearch_2001.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00521-4en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAquacultureen_UK
dc.citation.issn0044-8486en_UK
dc.citation.volume194en_UK
dc.citation.issue3-4en_UK
dc.citation.spage303en_UK
dc.citation.epage314en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaild.c.little@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAsian Institute of Technologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAsian Institute of Technologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNam Sai Farms Co. Ltden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000167021200010en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-0035869699en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid788127en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6095-3191en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2001-03-15en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-08-09en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBhujel, Ram C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorYakupitiyage, Amararatne|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTurner, Warren A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLittle, David C|0000-0002-6095-3191en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-16en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamelittled_aquacultureresearch_2001.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0044-8486en_UK
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
littled_aquacultureresearch_2001.pdfFulltext - Published Version353.95 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-16    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.