Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7276
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArmenta, Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorMartinez, Ana-Mabelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Jason Wen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMagallanes, Ricardoen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoulson, Daveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCaballero, Primitivoen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCave, Ronald Den_UK
dc.contributor.authorCisneros, Juanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorValle, Javieren_UK
dc.contributor.authorCastillejos, Vastyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPenagos, Dora Ien_UK
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Luisen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Trevoren_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-21T22:32:04Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-21T22:32:04Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2003-06en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/7276-
dc.description.abstractThe impact of commonly used organophosphate (chlorpyrifos, methamidophos), carbamate (carbaryl), and pyrethroid (cypermethrin) insecticides on insect natural enemies was compared with that of a nucleopolyhedrovirus (Baculoviridae) of Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in maize grown in southern Mexico. Analyses of the SELECTV and Koppert Side Effects (IOBC) databases on the impact of synthetic insecticides on arthropod natural enemies were used to predict ≈75–90% natural enemy mortality after application, whereas the bioinsecticide was predicted to have no effect. Three field trails were performed in mid- and late-whorl stage maize planted during the growing season in Chiapas State, Mexico. Synthetic insecticides were applied at product label recommended rates using a manual knapsack sprayer fitted with a cone nozzle. The biological pesticide was applied at a rate of 3 × 1012 occlusion bodies (OBs)/ha using identical equipment. Pesticide impacts on arthropods on maize plants were quantified at intervals between 1 and 22 d postapplication. The biological insecticide based on S. frugiperda nucleopolyhedrovirus had no adverse effect on insect natural enemies or other nontarget insect populations. Applications of the carbamate, pyrethroid, and organophosphate insecticides all resulted in reduced abundance of insect natural enemies, but for a relatively short period (8–15 d). Pesticide applications made to late-whorl stage maize resulted in lesser reductions in natural enemy populations than applications made at the mid-whorl stage, probably because of a greater abundance of physical refuges and reduced spray penetration of late-whorl maize.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherEntomological Society of Americaen_UK
dc.relationArmenta R, Martinez A, Chapman JW, Magallanes R, Goulson D, Caballero P, Cave RD, Cisneros J, Valle J, Castillejos V, Penagos DI, Garcia L & Williams T (2003) Impact of a nucleopolyhedrovirus bioinsecticide and selected synthetic insecticides on the abundance of insect natural enemies on maize in Southern Mexico. Journal of Economic Entomology, 96 (3), pp. 649-661. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-96.3.649en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectsynthetic pesticidesen_UK
dc.subjectbaculovirusen_UK
dc.subjectmaizeen_UK
dc.subjectnatural enemiesen_UK
dc.subjectcrop phenologyen_UK
dc.titleImpact of a nucleopolyhedrovirus bioinsecticide and selected synthetic insecticides on the abundance of insect natural enemies on maize in Southern Mexicoen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[armenta_et_al_2003_j_econ_entomol.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1603/0022-0493-96.3.649en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Economic Entomologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1938-291Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn0022-0493en_UK
dc.citation.volume96en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage649en_UK
dc.citation.epage661en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaildave.goulson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationIACR Rothamsteden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAutonomous University of Chiapas (UNACH)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Navarraen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Agrı́cola Panamericana, Hondurasen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR)en_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000183648000022en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid890477en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2003-06-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-08-03en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorArmenta, R|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMartinez, Ana-Mabel|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorChapman, Jason W|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMagallanes, Ricardo|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoulson, Dave|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCaballero, Primitivo|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCave, Ronald D|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCisneros, Juan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorValle, Javier|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCastillejos, Vasty|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPenagos, Dora I|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGarcia, Luis|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWilliams, Trevor|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamearmenta_et_al_2003_j_econ_entomol.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0022-0493en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
armenta_et_al_2003_j_econ_entomol.pdfFulltext - Published Version261.62 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.