Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7264
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Knight, Mairi E | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Martin, Andrew P | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Bishop, Stephen | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Osborne, Juliet L | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Hale, Roddy J | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Sanderson, Roy A | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Goulson, Dave | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T13:10:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T13:10:44Z | en_UK |
dc.date.issued | 2005-05 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7264 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Bumblebees are major pollinators of crops and wildflowers in northern temperate regions. Knowledge of their ecology is vital for the design of effective management and conservation strategies but key aspects remain poorly understood. Here we employed microsatellite markers to estimate and compare foraging range and nest density among four UK species: Bombus terrestris, Bombus pascuorum, Bombus lapidarius, and Bombus pratorum. Workers were sampled along a 1.5-km linear transect across arable farmland. Eight or nine polymorphic microsatellite markers were then used to identify putative sisters. In accordance with previous studies, minimum estimated maximum foraging range was greatest for B. terrestris (758 m) and least for B. pascuorum (449 m). The estimate for B. lapidarius was similar to B. pascuorum (450 m), while that of B. pratorum was intermediate (674 m). Since the area of forage available to bees increases as the square of foraging range, these differences correspond to a threefold variation in the area used by bumblebee nests of different species. Possible explanations for these differences are discussed. Estimates for nest density at the times of sampling were 29, 68, 117, and 26/km2 for B. terrestris, B. pascuorum, B. lapidarius and B. pratorum, respectively. These data suggest that even among the most common British bumblebee species, significant differences in fundamental aspects of their ecology exist, a finding that should be reflected in management and conservation strategies. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_UK |
dc.relation | Knight ME, Martin AP, Bishop S, Osborne JL, Hale RJ, Sanderson RA & Goulson D (2005) An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species. Molecular Ecology, 14 (6), pp. 1811-1820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02540.x | en_UK |
dc.rights | The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved | en_UK |
dc.subject | Bombus | en_UK |
dc.subject | foraging range | en_UK |
dc.subject | kinship | en_UK |
dc.subject | microsatellites | en_UK |
dc.subject | nest density | en_UK |
dc.title | An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargodate | 3000-01-01 | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargoreason | [knight_interspecificcomparison_2005.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work. | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02540.x | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Molecular Ecology | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1365-294X | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0962-1083 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 14 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 6 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 1811 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 1820 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.author.email | dave.goulson@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Southampton | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Rothamsted Research | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Southampton | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Rothamsted Research | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Newcastle University | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Newcastle University | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Biological and Environmental Sciences | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000228395900017 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 786602 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2005-05-31 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2012-08-03 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Knight, Mairi E| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Martin, Andrew P| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Bishop, Stephen| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Osborne, Juliet L| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Hale, Roddy J| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Sanderson, Roy A| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Goulson, Dave| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 3000-01-01 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved|| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | knight_interspecificcomparison_2005.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 0962-1083 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
knight_interspecificcomparison_2005.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 360.19 kB | Adobe PDF | Under Embargo until 3000-01-01 Request a copy |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.