Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7234
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLye, Gillianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJennings, S Nikkien_UK
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, Juliet Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoulson, Daveen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T09:33:33Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T09:33:33Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2011-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/7234-
dc.description.abstractEvidence for pollinator declines has led to concern that inadequate pollination services may limit crop yields. The global trade in commercial bumble bee (Bombus spp.) colonies provides pollination services for both glasshouse and open-field crops. For example, in the United Kingdom, commercial colonies of nonnative subspecies of the bumble bee Bombus terrestris L. imported from mainland Europe are widely used for the pollination of raspberries, Rubus idaeus L. The extent to which these commercial colonies supplement the services provided by wild pollinators has not been formally quantified and the impact of commercial bumble bees on native bees visiting the crop is unknown. Here, the impacts of allowing commercially available bumble bee colonies to forage on raspberry canes are assessed in terms of the yield of marketable fruit produced and the pollinator communities found foraging on raspberry flowers. No differences were found in the abundance, diversity, or composition of social bee species observed visiting raspberry flowers when commercial bumble bees were deployed compared with when they were absent. However, weight of marketable raspberries produced increased when commercial bees were present, indicating that wild pollinator services alone are inadequate for attaining maximum yields. The findings of the study suggests that proportional yield increases associated with deployment of commercial colonies may be small, but that nevertheless, investment in commercial colonies for raspberry pollination could produce very significant increases in net profit for the grower. Given potential environmental risks associated with the importation of nonnative bumble bees, the development of alternative solutions to the pollination deficit in raspberry crops in the United Kingdom may be beneficial.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherEntomological Society of Americaen_UK
dc.relationLye G, Jennings SN, Osborne JL & Goulson D (2011) Impacts of the Use of Nonnative Commercial Bumble Bees for Pollinator Supplementation in Raspberry. Journal of Economic Entomology, 104 (1), pp. 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC10092en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectRubus idaeusen_UK
dc.subjectBombus terrestrisen_UK
dc.subjectpollination limitationen_UK
dc.subjectScotlanden_UK
dc.subjectagricultureen_UK
dc.titleImpacts of the Use of Nonnative Commercial Bumble Bees for Pollinator Supplementation in Raspberryen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-29en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Lyeetal2011JEconEnto.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1603/EC10092en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Economic Entomologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1938-291Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn0022-0493en_UK
dc.citation.volume104en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage107en_UK
dc.citation.epage114en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaildave.goulson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMylnefield Research Services Ltden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRothamsted Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000287012800016en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-79952179795en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid789249en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-02-28en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-08-06en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorLye, Gillian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJennings, S Nikki|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOsborne, Juliet L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoulson, Dave|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameLyeetal2011JEconEnto.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0022-0493en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lyeetal2011JEconEnto.pdfFulltext - Published Version162.73 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-29    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.