Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7233
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoulson, Daveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLepais, Olivieren_UK
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Stephanieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, Juliet Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorSanderson, Roy Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCussans, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoffe, Louisen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDarvill, Benen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T09:32:53Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T09:32:53Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2010-12en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/7233-
dc.description.abstract1. We have little idea how landscape-scale factors influence the success of wild bumblebee nests over time. Here for the first time we use molecular markers to estimate within-season changes in the numbers of nests. 2. Workers of two bumblebee species were sampled in an arable landscape in late May–June and late July–August, and the numbers of nests represented in each sample were estimated. We compare the methods available to estimate nest number from such samples and conclude that methods which allow for heterogeneity in the probability of capture of nests provide the best fit to our data. Changes in numbers of nests at the two time points were used to infer nest survival. 3. The two bee species appeared to differ markedly in survival over time, with estimates of 45% of nests surviving for Bombus lapidarius and 91% for B. pascuorum. However, our data suggest that the foraging range of B. pascuorum may be greater in late season, which would lead us to overestimate nest survival in this species. Differential survival may also reflect differences in phenology between the two species. 4. The land use class which had the most consistent effects on nest number and survival was gardens; for B. lapidarius, the area of gardens within a 750 and 1000 m radius positively influenced nest survival, while for B. pascuorum, the number of nests in late samples was higher at sites with more gardens within a 500 and 750-m radius. For B. pascuorum, the area of grassland within a 250 and 500-m radius also positively influenced nest number in late samples, probably because this is the preferred nesting habitat for this species. 5. The importance of gardens is in accordance with previous studies which suggest that they now provide a stronghold for bumblebees in an otherwise impoverished agricultural environment; furthermore, our data suggest that the positive influence of gardens on bumblebee populations can spill over at least 1 km into surrounding farmland. 6. Synthesis and applications. The substantial effects that even small areas of local resources such as rough grassland or clover leys can have on bumblebee nest numbers and survival is of clear relevance for the design of pollinator management strategies.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWileyen_UK
dc.relationGoulson D, Lepais O, O'Connor S, Osborne JL, Sanderson RA, Cussans J, Goffe L & Darvill B (2010) Effects of land use at a landscape scale on bumblebee nest density and survival. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47 (6), pp. 1207-1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01872.xen_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectBombusen_UK
dc.subjectdensityen_UK
dc.subjectgardensen_UK
dc.subjectkinshipen_UK
dc.subjectmicrosatelliteen_UK
dc.subjectmortalityen_UK
dc.subjectpollination servicesen_UK
dc.subjectpopulation structureen_UK
dc.subjectsocial insectsen_UK
dc.titleEffects of land use at a landscape scale on bumblebee nest density and survivalen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[goulson_effectsoflanduse_2010.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01872.xen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Applied Ecologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1365-2664en_UK
dc.citation.issn0021-8901en_UK
dc.citation.volume47en_UK
dc.citation.issue6en_UK
dc.citation.spage1207en_UK
dc.citation.epage1215en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaildave.goulson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRothamsted Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRothamsted Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000283983200007en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-78149287311en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid789283en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-12-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-08-06en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoulson, Dave|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLepais, Olivier|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorO'Connor, Stephanie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOsborne, Juliet L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSanderson, Roy A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCussans, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoffe, Louis|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDarvill, Ben|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamegoulson_effectsoflanduse_2010.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0021-8901en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
goulson_effectsoflanduse_2010.pdfFulltext - Published Version323.66 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.