Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7189
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kells, Andrea R | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Holland, John | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Goulson, Dave | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-02T23:15:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-02T23:15:51Z | en_UK |
dc.date.issued | 2001-12 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7189 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The intensification of agriculture has led to declines in species diversity and abundance within groups of certain flora and fauna. Bumblebees (Bombus spp.) are one group where a decline has been documented, and it is thought to be attributable to a decrease in forage resources and potential nest sites. As bumblebees play an important role in the pollination of many entomophilous crops, this decline could impact on agricultural productivity. We examined the role of naturally regenerated field margins in providing forage plants on land where nectar resources are otherwise impoverished. The following question was addressed - Are naturally regenerated unsprayed field margins more attractive to foraging bumblebees and honeybees than cropped field margins managed as conservation headlands? Significantly more bees visited naturally regenerated field margins than cropped field margins. Honeybees (Apis mellifera), Bombus terrestris, and Bombus lapidarius were the most commonly observed bee species. Different wildflower species within the naturally regenerated margins varied greatly in relative number of visits received, and bumblebee species were found to prefer different flower species to honeybees. The potential role that naturally regenerated field margins could play in the conservation of bumblebee species, and the implications for other species of flora and fauna, are discussed. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers | en_UK |
dc.relation | Kells AR, Holland J & Goulson D (2001) The value of uncropped field margins for foraging bumblebees. Journal of Insect Conservation, 5 (4), pp. 283-291. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=yv4JPVwI&eid=2-s2.0-0035703419&md5=54613093fa8ca564ae2c06c51083d750; https://doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1013307822575 | en_UK |
dc.rights | The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved | en_UK |
dc.subject | Agriculture | en_UK |
dc.subject | Apis mellifera | en_UK |
dc.subject | Bombus | en_UK |
dc.subject | Floral resources | en_UK |
dc.subject | Naturally regenerated field margin | en_UK |
dc.title | The value of uncropped field margins for foraging bumblebees | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargodate | 3000-01-01 | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargoreason | [Kells_Value_of_uncropped_field_margins_2001.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work. | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1023/A:1013307822575 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Journal of Insect Conservation | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1572-9753 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1366-638X | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 5 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 4 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 283 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 291 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=yv4JPVwI&eid=2-s2.0-0035703419&md5=54613093fa8ca564ae2c06c51083d750 | en_UK |
dc.author.email | dave.goulson@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Southampton | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | The Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Biological and Environmental Sciences | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-0035703419 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 785788 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2001-12-31 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2012-08-02 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Kells, Andrea R| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Holland, John| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Goulson, Dave| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 3000-01-01 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved|| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Kells_Value_of_uncropped_field_margins_2001.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1366-638X | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kells_Value_of_uncropped_field_margins_2001.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 218.53 kB | Adobe PDF | Under Embargo until 3000-01-01 Request a copy |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.