Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7182
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCisneros, Juanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoulson, Daveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDerwent, Lara Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPenagos, Dora Ien_UK
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Oliviaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Trevoren_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-20T04:27:03Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-20T04:27:03Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2002-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/7182-
dc.description.abstractSpinosad (Dow AgroSciences) is a mixture of tetracyclic-macrolide compounds produced by a soil actinomycete and has been classified as a bioinsecticide. Spinosad is highly active against Lepidoptera but is reported to be practically nontoxic to insect natural enemies. We assessed the impact of Spinosad in a granular maize-flour formulation on a selection of insect predators over periods of 2–14 days. In all cases, the quantities of Spinosad used were less than the maximum recommended rates given on the product label. Adults of Aleochara bilineata Gyllenhal (Coleoptera:Staphylinidae) suffered a high prevalence of mortality following consumption of 1000 or 2000 ppm Spinosad active ingredient (a.i.), but little mortality at 200 ppm. Larvae of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera:Chrysopidae) did not consume the granular formulation and suffered little overall mortality. After 14 days of exposure, the earwig, Doru taeniatum (Dohrn) (Dermaptera:Forficulidae), suffered 48% mortality in the 1.2 ppm Spinosad treatment increasing to 98% in the 1200 ppm Spinosad treatment compared to 20% in controls. Earwigs suffered 86% mortality/intoxication 72 h after feeding on Spinosad-contaminated Spodoptera frugiperda J. E. Smith (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) larvae. A field trial was performed to compare applications of commercial granular chlorpyrifos and Spinosad in maize-flour granules (200 and 2000 ppm a.i.; 4.8–48 g a.i./ha, respectively) or as an aqueous spray (160 ppm a.i.; 48 g a.i./ha) on earwigs held inside gauze bags. Mortality of earwigs on control plants was less than 15% at 2 days postapplication compared to 33% on plants treated with granular chlorpyrifos, 83% on plants sprayed with 160 ppm Spinosad, and 91–95% on plants treated with 200–2000 ppm Spinosad granules, respectively. Further mortality in the 24-h period postsampling ranged from less than 5% in control treatments, to 9% in the chlorpyrifos treatment, and to 55–65% in the Spinosad spray and granule treatments. We conclude that Spinosad cannot be considered to have an environmental safety profile similar to most established biological insecticides.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationCisneros J, Goulson D, Derwent LC, Penagos DI, Hernandez O & Williams T (2002) Toxic effects of spinosad on predatory insects. Biological Control, 23 (2), pp. 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.2001.1000en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectSpinosaden_UK
dc.subjecttoxicityen_UK
dc.subjectnatural enemiesen_UK
dc.subjectformulationen_UK
dc.subjectForficulidaeen_UK
dc.titleToxic effects of spinosad on predatory insectsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-29en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[cisneros_spinosad_2002.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1006/bcon.2001.1000en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBiological Controlen_UK
dc.citation.issn1049-9644en_UK
dc.citation.volume23en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage156en_UK
dc.citation.epage163en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaildave.goulson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Southamptonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR)en_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000173596500008en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid786126en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2002-02-28en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-08-02en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCisneros, Juan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoulson, Dave|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDerwent, Lara C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPenagos, Dora I|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHernandez, Olivia|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWilliams, Trevor|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamecisneros_spinosad_2002.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1049-9644en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
cisneros_spinosad_2002.pdfFulltext - Published Version120.74 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-29    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.