Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7167
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Goulson, Dave | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Stout, Jane C | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Hawson, Sadie A | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Allen, John A | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-01T23:15:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-01T23:15:51Z | en_UK |
dc.date.issued | 1998-02 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7167 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The fecundity of insect-pollinated plants may not be linearly related to the number of flowers produced, since floral display will influence pollinator foraging patterns. We may expect more visits to plants with more flowers, but do these large plants receive more or fewer visits per flower than small plants? Do all pollinator species respond in the same way? We would also expect foragers to move less between plants when the number of flowers per plant are large, which may reduce cross-pollination compared to plants with few flowers. We examine the relationships between numbers of inflorescence per plant, bumblebee foraging behaviour and seed set in comfrey, Symphytum officinale, a self-incompatible perennial herb. Bumblebee species differed in their response to the size of floral display. More individuals of Bombus pratorum and the nectar-robbing B.␣terrestris were attracted to plants with larger floral displays, but B. pascuorum exhibited no increase in recruitment according to display size. Once attracted, all bee species visited more inflorescences per plant on plants with more inflorescences. Overall the visitation rate per inflorescence and seed set per flower was independent of the number of inflorescences per plant. Variation in seed set was not explained by the numbers of bumblebees attracted or by the number of inflorescences they visited for any bee species. However, the mean seed set per flower (1.18) was far below the maximum possible (4 per flower). We suggest that in this system seed set is not limited by pollination but by other factors, possibly nutritional resources. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_UK |
dc.relation | Goulson D, Stout JC, Hawson SA & Allen JA (1998) Floral display size in comfrey, Symphytum officinale L. (Boraginaceae): relationships with visitation by three bumblebee species and subsequent seed set. Oecologia, 113 (4), pp. 502-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050402 | en_UK |
dc.rights | The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved | en_UK |
dc.subject | Bombus spp. | en_UK |
dc.subject | foraging | en_UK |
dc.subject | comfrey | en_UK |
dc.subject | floral display | en_UK |
dc.subject | seed set | en_UK |
dc.title | Floral display size in comfrey, Symphytum officinale L. (Boraginaceae): relationships with visitation by three bumblebee species and subsequent seed set | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2999-12-29 | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargoreason | [goulson_floral-display-1998.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work. | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s004420050402 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Oecologia | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1432-1939 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0029-8549 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 113 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 4 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 502 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 508 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.author.email | dave.goulson@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Biological and Environmental Sciences | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Southampton | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Southampton | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Southampton | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000072196300006 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 787421 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 1998-02-28 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2012-08-01 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Goulson, Dave| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Stout, Jane C| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Hawson, Sadie A| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Allen, John A| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2999-12-29 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved|| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | goulson_floral-display-1998.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 0029-8549 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
goulson_floral-display-1998.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 445.67 kB | Adobe PDF | Under Embargo until 2999-12-29 Request a copy |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.