|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||End State Copying by Humans (Homo sapiens): Implications for a Comparative Perspective on Cumulative Culture|
|Author(s):||Caldwell, Christine Anna|
|Citation:||Caldwell CA, Schillinger K, Evans C & Hopper L (2012) End State Copying by Humans (Homo sapiens): Implications for a Comparative Perspective on Cumulative Culture. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126 (2), pp. 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026828|
|Abstract:||It has been proposed that the uniqueness of human cumulative culture may be attributable to humans' greater orientation towards copying the process of behavior (imitation), compared with the products (emulation), resulting in particularly high fidelity transmission. Following on from previous work indicating that adult human participants can exhibit cumulative learning on the basis of product copying alone, we now investigate whether such learning involves high fidelity transmission. Eighty adult human participants were presented with a task previously shown to elicit cumulative learning under experimental conditions, which involved building a tower from spaghetti and modeling clay. Each participant was shown two completed towers, ostensibly built by previous participants, but actually built to pre-specified designs by the experimenter. This end state information was provided either in the form of photographs, or the presence of actual towers. High fidelity matching to these end states was apparent in both demonstration conditions, even for a design that was demonstrably suboptimal with regard to the goal of the task (maximizing tower height). We conclude that, although high fidelity transmission is likely to be implicated in cumulative culture, action copying is not always necessary for this to occur. Furthermore, since chimpanzees apparently copy behavioral processes and well as products, and also transmit behavior with high fidelity, the stark absence of unequivocal examples of cumulative culture in nonhumans may be attributable to factors other than imitative ability.|
|Rights:||Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Journal of Comparative Psychology. ©2012 American Psychological Association (http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=browsePA.volumes&jcode=com). This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.|
|Notes:||Research funded by ESRC|
|Caldwell2012JCP.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||251.4 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.