Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/675
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Dianeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPollard, Bethen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Marieen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-09T08:06:53Z-
dc.date.available2013-06-09T08:06:53Z-
dc.date.issued2007-08en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/675-
dc.description.abstractThis study explored the ability of the Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire (CPG) to operationalise the WHO’s model of health outcomes, namely the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Twelve expert judges used the method of discriminant content validation to allocate the 7 items of the CPG to one or more ICF outcome, namely, impairment, activity limitations and participation restrictions. One-sample t-tests classified each item as measuring impairment, activity limitations or participation restrictions, or a combination thereof. The results indicated that the CPG contains items able to measure each of the three ICF outcomes. However, the pain grade classification system used in the CPG conflates the ICF outcomes. The implication of this conflation of outcome for the assessment of interventions is discussed.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationDixon D, Pollard B & Johnston M (2007) What does the Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire Measure?. Pain, 130 (3), pp. 249-253. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03043959; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.004en_UK
dc.rightsPublished in Pain by Elsevier.en_UK
dc.subjectpainen_UK
dc.subjectICFen_UK
dc.subjecthealth outcomesen_UK
dc.subjectmeasurementen_UK
dc.subjectdisabilityen_UK
dc.titleWhat does the Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire Measure?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.004en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePAINen_UK
dc.citation.issn1872-6623en_UK
dc.citation.issn0304-3959en_UK
dc.citation.volume130en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage249en_UK
dc.citation.epage253en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03043959en_UK
dc.citation.date25/01/2007en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000248496400008en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-34250858109en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid810487en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2007-01-25en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2009-01-14en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDixon, Diane|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPollard, Beth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJohnston, Marie|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2009-01-14en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2009-01-14|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameRevised Text.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0304-3959en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Revised Text.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version38.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.