Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/6643
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCussans, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoulson, Daveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSanderson, Roy Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoffe, Louisen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDarvill, Benen_UK
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, Juliet Len_UK
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-09T15:14:33Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-09T15:14:33Z-
dc.date.issued2010-07-23en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/6643-
dc.description.abstractBackground Insect pollinator abundance, in particular that of bees, has been shown to be high where there is a super-abundance of floral resources; for example in association with mass-flowering crops and also in gardens where flowering plants are often densely planted. Since land management affects pollinator numbers, it is also likely to affect the resultant pollination of plants growing in these habitats. We hypothesised that the seed or fruit set of two plant species, typically pollinated by bumblebees and/or honeybees might respond in one of two ways: 1) pollination success could be reduced when growing in a floriferous environment, via competition for pollinators, or 2) pollination success could be enhanced because of increased pollinator abundance in the vicinity. Methodology/Principal Findings We compared the pollination success of experimental plants of Glechoma hederacea L. and Lotus corniculatus L. growing in gardens and arable farmland. On the farms, the plants were placed either next to a mass-flowering crop (oilseed rape, Brassica napus L. or field beans, Vicia faba L.) or next to a cereal crop (wheat, Triticum spp.). Seed set of G. hederacea and fruit set of L. corniculatus were significantly higher in gardens compared to arable farmland. There was no significant difference in pollination success of G. hederacea when grown next to different crops, but for L. corniculatus, fruit set was higher in the plants growing next to oilseed rape when the crop was in flower. Conclusions/Significance The results show that pollination services can limit fruit set of wild plants in arable farmland, but there is some evidence that the presence of a flowering crop can facilitate their pollination (depending on species and season). We have also demonstrated that gardens are not only beneficial to pollinators, but also to the process of pollination.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_UK
dc.relationCussans J, Goulson D, Sanderson RA, Goffe L, Darvill B & Osborne JL (2010) Two Bee-Pollinated Plant Species Show Higher Seed Production when Grown in Gardens Compared to Arable Farmland. PLoS ONE, 5 (7), p. e11753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011753en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher is open-access. Open access publishing allows free access to and distribution of published articles where the author retains copyright of their work by employing a Creative Commons attribution licence. Proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details should be given.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_UK
dc.titleTwo Bee-Pollinated Plant Species Show Higher Seed Production when Grown in Gardens Compared to Arable Farmlanden_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0011753en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePLoS ONEen_UK
dc.citation.issn1932-6203en_UK
dc.citation.volume5en_UK
dc.citation.issue7en_UK
dc.citation.spagee11753en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaildave.goulson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRothamsted Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRothamsted Researchen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000280243800023en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-77955407566en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid788908en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-07-23en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-05-24en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCussans, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoulson, Dave|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSanderson, Roy A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoffe, Louis|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDarvill, Ben|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOsborne, Juliet L|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2012-05-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/|2012-05-24|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamegoulson_twobeepollinated_2010.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
goulson_twobeepollinated_2010.pdfFulltext - Published Version649.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.