Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Economics Working Papers
Peer Review Status: Unrefereed
Title: Forced to be Rich? Returns to Compulsory Schooling in Britain
Author(s): Devereux, Paul J
Hart, Robert A
Contact Email:
Citation: Devereux PJ & Hart RA (2008) Forced to be Rich? Returns to Compulsory Schooling in Britain. Stirling Economics Discussion Paper, 2008-02.
Keywords: Returns to schooling
British 1947 compulsory schooling law change
Regression discontinuity design
Education Economic aspects
Education Law and legislation
JEL Code(s): I20: Education and Research Institutions: General
J24: Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
J30: Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs: General
J31: Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2008
Date Deposited: 31-Oct-2008
Series/Report no.: Stirling Economics Discussion Paper, 2008-02
Abstract: Researchers using changes in compulsory schooling laws as instruments have typically estimated very high returns to additional schooling that are greater than the corresponding OLS estimates. Given that the first order source of bias in OLS is likely to be upward as more able individuals tend to obtain more education, such high estimates are usually rationalized as reflecting the fact that the group of individuals who are influenced by the law change have particularly high returns to education. That is, the Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) is larger than the average treatment effect (ATE). However, studies of a 1947 British compulsory schooling law change that impacted about half the relevant population (so the LATE approximates the ATE) have also found very high IV returns to schooling (about 15%), suggesting that the ATE of schooling is greater than OLS estimates would suggest. This constitutes a puzzle: How can the OLS return to schooling be a significantly downward biased estimate of the ATE when the primary source of OLS bias should be upward? We utilize a source of earnings data, the New Earnings Survey Panel Data-set (NESPD), that is superior to the datasets previously used and conclude that there is no such puzzle: the IV estimates are small and much lower than OLS. In fact, there is no evidence of any return for women and the return for men is in the 4-7% range. We do, however, find that men benefit from greater schooling through a reduction in earnings variability.
Type: Working Paper
Affiliation: University College Dublin (UCD)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SEDP-2008-02-Devereux-Hart.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version147.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.