|Appears in Collections:||Aquaculture Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Photoperiodic effects on precocious maturation, growth and smoltification in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar|
Porter, Mark J R
Mitchell, David F
Bromage, Niall R
|Citation:||Berrill I, Porter MJR, Smart A, Mitchell DF & Bromage NR (2003) Photoperiodic effects on precocious maturation, growth and smoltification in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, Aquaculture, 222, pp. 239-252.|
|Abstract:||Current Atlantic salmon farming practice induces early smoltification with artificial photoperiod regimes, however the importance of these photoperiods on parr maturation and interactions with smoltification are poorly understood. These questions were addressed in the present investigation, which examined the effects of photoperiod manipulation on the development, maturation and smoltification of individually tagged parr. Approximately 9000 salmon parr from a high grilsing stock were exposed to continuous light (LL) from first feeding. Three sub-groups of 2400 parr, each sub-group in triplicate tanks, were then exposed to an 8 week “winter photoperiod” (LD 10:14) starting on either the 18th May, the 9th August or the 20th September (defined respectively as the May, August and September groups). Following the artificial winter each group was returned to LL. A fourth group of 1600 fish was maintained in replicate tanks on LL throughout. The highest levels of maturation (approx. 20%) were recorded in the May group. August and September groups showed low levels of maturity ( < 5%) with constant LL throughout resulting in intermediate levels ( < 9%). However, only groups exposed to the August photoperiod showed high levels of smoltification. It is concluded that the photoperiod to which parr are exposed early in their life acts as an important trigger for precocious maturation but does not necessarily phase shift the endogenous rhythm which is thought to control its timing. Smoltification is strongly influenced by the timing of exposure to winter photoperiod with clear evidence indicating that maturation and smoltification are not mutually exclusive processes.|
|Rights:||Published in Aquaculture by Elsevier|
|iI berrill maturation_smolt paper revised FINAL.pdf||93.57 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|iI berrill maturation_smolt paper revised FINAL.doc||367.5 kB||Microsoft Word||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.