Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/384
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDonaldson, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorCurran, Timen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-05T02:19:45Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-05T02:19:45Z-
dc.date.issued2007-06en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/384-
dc.description.abstractIn the current issue of NeuroImage (Vol 36, 2007), two Event-Related Potential (ERP) studies of recognition memory for faces are published back-to-back (Curran and Hancock, and MacKenzie and Donaldson). Both studies suggest that qualitatively distinct retrieval processes support recognition, consistent with “dual-process” models of recognition memory. However, the studies do so on the basis of apparently different results, a discrepancy that is surprising given the similarity of their designs. Here we place the studies in context, and highlight potential reasons for the discrepancy.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationDonaldson D & Curran T (2007) Letter to the editor. NeuroImage, 36 (2), pp. 488-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.049en_UK
dc.rightsPublished in Neuroimage by Elsevier.en_UK
dc.subjectMemoryen_UK
dc.subjectFacesen_UK
dc.subjectRecollectionen_UK
dc.subjectFamiliarityen_UK
dc.subjectNeuralen_UK
dc.subjectERPsen_UK
dc.subjectEvoked potentials (Electrophysiology)en_UK
dc.subjectMemory Recognition (Psychology)en_UK
dc.subjectMemory Recollection (Psychology)en_UK
dc.subjectFace perceptionen_UK
dc.titleLetter to the editoren_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.049en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleNeuroImageen_UK
dc.citation.issn1053-8119en_UK
dc.citation.volume36en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage488en_UK
dc.citation.epage489en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Coloradoen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000246766700023en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-34248181590en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid809517en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8036-3455en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2007-06-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2008-06-06en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDonaldson, David|0000-0002-8036-3455en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCurran, Tim|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2008-06-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2008-06-06|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameNIMcurran.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1053-8119en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NIMcurran.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version58.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.