Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38256
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeek, Timen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNorth, Kateen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMoore, C Douglasen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSubke, Jens-Arneen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-27T00:03:06Z-
dc.date.available2026-08-27T00:03:06Z-
dc.date.issued2026-07-16en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/38256-
dc.description.abstractClimate change is driving international heritage to reconsider the conservation strategies applied to traditional historic buildings. To date, the preferred repair method for rubble stone buildings in the UK has been pointing, and the style employed is the heritage joint: a recessed joint that highlights the profile of the stone with aggregates exposed. This paper challenges that conservation approach, by demonstrating that a bare stone method leaves historic fabric in Scotland vulnerable to water penetration, particularly in the north and west regions where wind-driven rain predominates. In addition, we argue that the heritage joint lacks historic authenticity, and that the accurate presentation of architecture is related to the original functionality of the building system. By turning to the archaeological record, we demonstrate that pre-industrial Scottish vernacular buildings were originally completely lime-coated, and that this was an effective way of managing moisture. By the 18th century, changing tastes expressed a preference for bare stone and ultimately this led to finishes being stripped and the joints between stones being pointed in many different styles, few of which are employed within the heritage sector. The strong winds experienced in storm conditions create external/internal pressure differences on windward elevations. The rain that accompanies wind is attracted into the internal space in these conditions where wall widths diminish, and where there is no external finish. In an innovative experiment, the actualistic pressure differences observed in storm conditions are created using a purpose-built airtight chamber and these pressure differences are accompanied by simulated rainfall. The results of the experiment show that pressure difference is a significant contributor to water penetration at the window embrasure. Crucially, the experiment demonstrates that completely lime coating rubble stone buildings moderates this ingress, while the heritage joint is the least effective barrier to water. The baseline for conserving and improving historic rubble building fabric is considering complete lime finishes as vital tools in building resilience.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherUCL Pressen_UK
dc.relationMeek T, North K, Moore CD & Subke J (2026) Lime finishes: what's the point? Pressure difference in storm conditions in a changing climate. <i>UCL Open Environment</i>, 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3623en_UK
dc.rightsAttribution - You must give appropriate credit, provde a link to the the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any wat that suggest the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restriction - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectharlen_UK
dc.subjectlimewashen_UK
dc.subjectpressure diferenceen_UK
dc.subjectwater penetrationen_UK
dc.subjectheritageen_UK
dc.titleLime finishes: what's the point? Pressure difference in storm conditions in a changing climateen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3623en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid42516398en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleUCL Open Environmenten_UK
dc.citation.issn2632-0886en_UK
dc.citation.volume8en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.author.emailjens-arne.subke@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date16/07/2026en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid105045944097en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid2284227en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3648-4273en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9244-639Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2026-06-08en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-06-08en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2026-08-04en_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMeek, Tim|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNorth, Kate|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMoore, C Douglas|0000-0003-3648-4273en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSubke, Jens-Arne|0000-0001-9244-639Xen_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|University of Stirling|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2026-08-25en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2026-08-25|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameucloe-3623-meek.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2632-0886en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ucloe-3623-meek.pdfFulltext - Published Version7.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.