Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38123
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLoosemore, Martinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Michael Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSuchowerska, Roksolanaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSpiesova, Annaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBarraket, Josephineen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-30T07:22:07Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-30T07:22:07Z-
dc.date.issued2025-02-11en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/38123-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This paper aims to compare the effects of social procurement policies on companies in the Victorian and Scottish construction industries. Scotland and Victoria have led the way in the recent revival of social procurement. Design/methodology/approach: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 27 organisations and 28 participants who have experience of implementing social procurement policies into the construction industries of both jurisdictions. Findings: Findings contribute important new comparative insights from multiple stakeholder perspectives, into the effects of social procurement policies on firms operating in the construction industries of the two jurisdictions. Findings indicate an increasing awareness of social procurement in the construction industries of both Scotland and Victoria. However, differences in policy design determine the nature and extent of this awareness, the level of empowerment felt by actors and the social impact these new policies have in practice. It is concluded that to maximise the social impact of social procurement policies into major industries like construction, policymakers need to carefully consider supply-side limitations, the political context into which social procurement is being implemented and the way they prescribe what types of social value they want to create and for whom. Social implications: Successful social procurement policy implementation into the construction industry can have significant positive social implications for the communities in which the industry builds due to the large numbers of people it employs and its large multiplier effect into the wider economy. Originality/value: By investigating the effects of social procurement policies on a cross-section of organisations from across the construction industry supply chain, this international study, contributes new comparative insights to the emerging bodies of research on the impact of public procurement on companies in major industries like construction.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherEmeralden_UK
dc.relationLoosemore M, Roy MJ, Suchowerska R, Spiesova A & Barraket J (2025) The effects of social procurement policy on companies in the construction industry: an international comparison of Australia and Scotland. <i>Journal of Public Procurement</i>, 25 (1), pp. 41-63. https://doi.org/10.1108/jopp-02-2024-0018en_UK
dc.rightsCopyright Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Publishing Ltd. Final version citation: Loosemore, M., Roy, M. J., Suchowerska, R., Spiesova, A., & Barraket, J. (2025). The effects of social procurement policy on companies in the construction industry: an international comparison of Australia and Scotland. Journal of Public Procurement, 25(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-02-2024-0018en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectSocial procurementen_UK
dc.subjectScotlanden_UK
dc.subjectAustraliaen_UK
dc.subjectConstruction industryen_UK
dc.subjectPolicy implementationen_UK
dc.titleThe effects of social procurement policy on companies in the construction industry: an international comparison of Australia and Scotlanden_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/jopp-02-2024-0018en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Public Procurementen_UK
dc.citation.issn1535-0118en_UK
dc.citation.issn1535-0118en_UK
dc.citation.volume25en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage41en_UK
dc.citation.epage63en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderAustralian Research Councilen_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttps://socialequity.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/5454509/Loosemore-et-al-AAM_10435308830612445012.pdfen_UK
dc.author.emailmichael.roy1@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date17/12/2024en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Technology, Sydneyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationManagement, Work and Organisationen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwinburne University of Technologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGlasgow Caledonian Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Melbourneen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001376970000001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85212220188en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid2085514en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1834-0826en_UK
dc.date.accepted2024-11-16en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-11-16en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2026-05-04en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorLoosemore, Martin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoy, Michael J|0000-0002-1834-0826en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSuchowerska, Roksolana|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSpiesova, Anna|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBarraket, Josephine|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Australian Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000923en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2026-05-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2026-05-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameLoosemore et al 2025 Authors Pre Publication Version.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1535-0118en_UK
dc.description.sdgIndustry, Innovation and Infrastructureen_UK
dc.description.sdgReduced Inequalitiesen_UK
Appears in Collections:Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Loosemore et al 2025 Authors Pre Publication Version.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version478.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.