Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37908| Appears in Collections: | Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles |
| Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
| Title: | Evaluating changes and predictors of intention to act on health in urban development: a single-arm pre-post mixed-methods study of the changing mindsets intervention |
| Author(s): | Turnbull, Sophie L Jordan, Martha Linnett, Rebecca J Bondy, Krista |
| Contact Email: | krista.bondy@stir.ac.uk |
| Keywords: | Urban health Health equity Psycho-social intervention Chronic disease Decision making |
| Issue Date: | 6-Feb-2026 |
| Date Deposited: | 9-Feb-2026 |
| Citation: | Turnbull SL, Jordan M, Linnett RJ & Bondy K (2026) Evaluating changes and predictors of intention to act on health in urban development: a single-arm pre-post mixed-methods study of the changing mindsets intervention. <i>Archives of Public Health</i>, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-026-01843-0 |
| Abstract: | Background The built environment contributes to rising non-communicable diseases, including cancer, diabetes, respiratory illness, and poor mental health. These impacts disproportionately affect lower socio-economic groups, who experience greater exposure to harmful urban features. Evidence on these links alone has not led private-sector urban developers to prioritise health. The Changing Mindsets intervention was designed to increase intention to act on health and health inequalities among private-sector urban development professionals. This study assessed whether the intervention increased intention to act and identified predictors of change. Methods We conducted a single-arm pre-post mixed-methods evaluation of the Changing Mindsets intervention delivered at six industry events in 2024, including four in-person and two online sessions. The intervention combined an industry-partner-led presentation, peer discussion, and a supporting website. Surveys were completed immediately before (T1), immediately after (T2), and three-months after the intervention (T3). Paired analyses assessed pre-post change in intention to act. Logistic regression examined predictors of improvement from T1 to T2. Seven participants completed follow-up interviews exploring changes in thinking and actions taken. Results Of 156 attendees, 101 completed the T1 survey, 69 completed the T2 survey, and 22 completed the three-month follow-up. Immediately after the intervention, 19% of participants showed an increase in intention to act on health, while most showed no change. Paired analyses indicated a small increase in mean intention scores from T1 to T2, with limited evidence of a consistent group-level effect. Lower baseline intention and increased perceived psychological proximity to health issues were associated with improvement in intention to act. Mean intention scores remained elevated at three-months among respondents. Qualitative findings suggested that changes in thinking were linked to challenged assumptions about who can act on health. Reported actions most often involved initiating conversations and influencing others. Conclusions The Changing Mindsets intervention was associated with increased intention to act on health among a subset of urban development professionals, particularly those with lower baseline intention and greater perceived proximity to health issues. Evidence for a strong average pre-post effect was limited. However, intention remained elevated at three-month follow-up among respondents, suggesting retention of motivation over time. |
| DOI Link: | 10.1186/s13690-026-01843-0 |
| Rights: | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
| Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s13690-026-01843-0_reference.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 960.84 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.
