Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37849
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBoyd Williams, Natalieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Benen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRaha, Debadayitaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBaruah, Debendra Chandraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKalina, Marcen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTilley, Elizabethen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDickie, Jenniferen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-31T01:06:09Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-31T01:06:09Z-
dc.date.issued2026-01en_UK
dc.identifier.other104496en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/37849-
dc.description.abstractToilet-linked anaerobic digesters (TLADs) are promoted as technologies that can simultaneously address household energy, sanitation, and agricultural needs, yet diffusion remains uneven, and project failures are frequently attributed to “socio-cultural resistance.” This paper challenges that narrative by examining why Nepal's domestic biogas programme achieved greater success in implementing TLADs than India's, despite broadly similar policies and rural socio-economic conditions. Using a sustainability transitions framework, we conduct a comparative case study of successful adoption in Nepal's Gandaki Province with non-adoption in Assam, India. The study draws on 57 household interviews, 15 expert-stakeholder interviews, and policy and programme documents. Findings indicate that while socio-cultural norms influence TLAD diffusion, they are not stand-alone determinants of household transitions. Instead, these norms interact with programme design, governance structures, institutional commitment, and wider policy environments, and are conditioned by local socio-technical contexts. These interactions shape how socio-cultural norms manifest in relation to technology adoption at the household level. We argue that failed transitions are too often attributed disproportionately to socio-cultural resistance—a framing that unfairly shifts responsibility onto households while obscuring systemic shortcomings such as inadequate targeting, weak institutional support, and misalignment between technologies and local contexts. A more balanced framing should acknowledge socio-cultural norms while situating them within broader socio-technical and policy environments. Such reframing could shift research and practice away from narratives of household blame and towards critical assessments of contextual fit, programme capacity, and policy coherence, supporting more equitable and context-appropriate transitions in sanitation and household energy systems such as TLADs.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationBoyd Williams N, Campbell B, Raha D, Baruah DC, Kalina M, Tilley E & Dickie J (2026) Rethinking socio-cultural resistance: Systemic factors behind successful and failed transitions to toilet-linked anaerobic digesters in Nepal and India. <i>Energy Research & Social Science</i>, 131, Art. No.: 104496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104496en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleRethinking socio-cultural resistance: Systemic factors behind successful and failed transitions to toilet-linked anaerobic digesters in Nepal and Indiaen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.erss.2025.104496en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEnergy Research and Social Scienceen_UK
dc.citation.issn2214-6296en_UK
dc.citation.volume131en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen_UK
dc.author.emailj.a.dickie@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date10/01/2026en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationETH Zurichen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Durhamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Lincolnen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationTezpur Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationETH Zurichen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationETH Zurichen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001664796400001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid105027959944en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid2225099en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6302-3854en_UK
dc.date.accepted2025-12-04en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-12-04en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2026-01-12en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBoyd Williams, Natalie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCampbell, Ben|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRaha, Debadayita|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBaruah, Debendra Chandra|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKalina, Marc|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTilley, Elizabeth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDickie, Jennifer|0000-0002-6302-3854en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Natural Environment Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2026-01-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2026-01-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameBoyd Williams et al Rethinking socio-cultural resistance.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2214-6296en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Boyd Williams et al Rethinking socio-cultural resistance.pdfFulltext - Published Version1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.