Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37597
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Visual discomfort for flickering sinusoids is not predicted by the spatio-temporal contrast sensitivity function
Author(s): Hibbard, Paul B
Asher, Jordi M
O'Hare, Louise
Evans, Caitlin
Dow, Caelan
Contact Email: paul.hibbard@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Visual discomfort
Spatial frequency
Temporal frequency
Contrast sensitivity
Sensory sensitivity
Issue Date: Jan-2026
Date Deposited: 14-Nov-2025
Citation: Hibbard PB, Asher JM, O'Hare L, Evans C & Dow C (2026) Visual discomfort for flickering sinusoids is not predicted by the spatio-temporal contrast sensitivity function. <i>Vision Research</i>, 238, Art. No.: 108720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2025.108720
Abstract: Visual discomfort, the unpleasant, aversive experience associated with some visual stimuli, is most pronounced for flickering and spatially repetitive stimuli. It has been proposed that the degree of visual discomfort for such stimuli can be predicted by the contrast sensitivity function, peaking at midrange spatial and temporal frequencies. We evaluated the spatio-temporal tuning of visual discomfort for flickering, sinusoidal stimuli. Discomfort increased with spatial frequency for static and slowly flickering stimuli, but decreased with spatial frequency for stimuli flickering at 16 Hz. Discomfort increased with temporal frequency for spatially uniform stimuli, and for all spatial frequencies. Flickering stimuli were more uncomfortable than static stimuli of any spatial frequency. Spatially uniform stimuli flickering at 16 Hz, the highest frequency tested, were rated as the most uncomfortable. These results deviate from the contrast sensitivity function, which predicts that discomfort should be highest for static stimuli, with bandpass spatial frequency tuning. This discrepancy indicates that threshold-level visual sensitivity is not a good predictor of visual discomfort for high contrast stimuli. Our results are however consistent with efficient coding models, which predict higher levels of excitation for high spatial and temporal frequencies when stimuli are presented at a high contrast. They are also consistent with physiological measures of cortical responses to high contrast stimuli.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.visres.2025.108720
Rights: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hibbard2026.pdfFulltext - Published Version4.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.