Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37519
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy eTheses
Title: Competition Law in relation to Cartels that have a Cross-Border Impact: Investigation, Enforcement and Co-operation - A Critical Appraisal of Practice in the EU, Algeria and Egypt
Author(s): Omran, Mohamed Mustafa Ali
Supervisor(s): Beaumont, Paul
Okoli, Pontian
Keywords: Competition Law
Private International Law
Cross-border cartels
European Union (EU)
Algeria
Egypt
Private actions for damages
Extraterritoriality
2019 Hague Judgments Convention
Recognition of foreign judgments
Cross-border cooperation
Public enforcement
Private enforcement
Cartel investigations
Issue Date: 7-May-2025
Publisher: University of Stirling
Abstract: This thesis examines how the EU Commission investigates, enforces, and cooperates with other jurisdictions—specifically Algeria and Egypt—in addressing the anti-competitive effects of hard-core cross-border cartels. It aims to assess the effectiveness of these enforcement and cooperation mechanisms and to identify the lessons that Algeria and Egypt can draw from the EU’s experience in developing their own competition law frameworks. The study relies on two complementary methods suited to the nature of the topic. It first draws on a doctrinal analysis to understand how each jurisdiction defines and treats hard-core cartels—whether they are considered unlawful by their very nature (“by object”) or only when their effects on competition are proven. These distinctions influence how cases are handled in practice and the kind of sanctions applied. The second strand of the research uses a comparative approach to assess how the EU, Algeria, and Egypt design and implement their rules on anti-cartel enforcement. While both African systems show traces of the EU model of competition law, their enforcement practices and policy choices remain shaped by domestic priorities and institutional realities. The findings show that effective action against cross-border cartels requires both proactive market monitoring and reactive investigation in response to credible information or complaints. Strong cooperation and coordination between competition agencies—grounded in confidentiality and mutual trust—are essential for success. Although the EU has developed advanced mechanisms for enforcement and cooperation, Algeria and Egypt continue to rely on traditional procedures for recognising and enforcing foreign judgments, which remain largely untested in cartel cases. The research highlights the potential role of the 2019 Judgments Convention in strengthening cross-border recognition and enforcement of competition judgments. It recommends that Algeria and Egypt consider accession to this Convention to enhance their enforcement capacities and to ensure that judgments against cross-border cartels can be recognised and enforced across other contracting jurisdictions.
Type: Thesis or Dissertation
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37519

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mohamed Omran - PhD Thesis - Final Submission Version - 2025.pdfPhD Thesis2.82 MBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2027-10-28    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.