Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37519
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBeaumont, Paul-
dc.contributor.advisorOkoli, Pontian-
dc.contributor.authorOmran, Mohamed Mustafa Ali-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-27T13:20:13Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05-07-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/37519-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines how the EU Commission investigates, enforces, and cooperates with other jurisdictions—specifically Algeria and Egypt—in addressing the anti-competitive effects of hard-core cross-border cartels. It aims to assess the effectiveness of these enforcement and cooperation mechanisms and to identify the lessons that Algeria and Egypt can draw from the EU’s experience in developing their own competition law frameworks. The study relies on two complementary methods suited to the nature of the topic. It first draws on a doctrinal analysis to understand how each jurisdiction defines and treats hard-core cartels—whether they are considered unlawful by their very nature (“by object”) or only when their effects on competition are proven. These distinctions influence how cases are handled in practice and the kind of sanctions applied. The second strand of the research uses a comparative approach to assess how the EU, Algeria, and Egypt design and implement their rules on anti-cartel enforcement. While both African systems show traces of the EU model of competition law, their enforcement practices and policy choices remain shaped by domestic priorities and institutional realities. The findings show that effective action against cross-border cartels requires both proactive market monitoring and reactive investigation in response to credible information or complaints. Strong cooperation and coordination between competition agencies—grounded in confidentiality and mutual trust—are essential for success. Although the EU has developed advanced mechanisms for enforcement and cooperation, Algeria and Egypt continue to rely on traditional procedures for recognising and enforcing foreign judgments, which remain largely untested in cartel cases. The research highlights the potential role of the 2019 Judgments Convention in strengthening cross-border recognition and enforcement of competition judgments. It recommends that Algeria and Egypt consider accession to this Convention to enhance their enforcement capacities and to ensure that judgments against cross-border cartels can be recognised and enforced across other contracting jurisdictions.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.subjectCompetition Lawen_GB
dc.subjectPrivate International Lawen_GB
dc.subjectCross-border cartelsen_GB
dc.subjectEuropean Union (EU)en_GB
dc.subjectAlgeriaen_GB
dc.subjectEgypten_GB
dc.subjectPrivate actions for damagesen_GB
dc.subjectExtraterritorialityen_GB
dc.subject2019 Hague Judgments Conventionen_GB
dc.subjectRecognition of foreign judgmentsen_GB
dc.subjectCross-border cooperationen_GB
dc.subjectPublic enforcementen_GB
dc.subjectPrivate enforcementen_GB
dc.subjectCartel investigationsen_GB
dc.subject.lcshAntitrust lawen_GB
dc.subject.lcshEnforcement measures (International law)en_GB
dc.subject.lcshCartelsen_GB
dc.subject.lcshJudgments, Foreignen_GB
dc.subject.lcshEuropean Unionen_GB
dc.subject.lcshAlgeriaen_GB
dc.subject.lcshEgypten_GB
dc.subject.lcshConvention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (2019 July 2)en_GB
dc.titleCompetition Law in relation to Cartels that have a Cross-Border Impact: Investigation, Enforcement and Co-operation - A Critical Appraisal of Practice in the EU, Algeria and Egypten_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen_GB
dc.rights.embargodate2027-10-27-
dc.rights.embargoreasonI request a two-year embargo on public access to this thesis to allow time for the preparation and publication of several peer-reviewed journal articles and/or a monograph based on its original findings. Immediate open access may compromise the originality required by academic publishers and limit the opportunity to disseminate the research in high-impact academic venues. This embargo applies to both electronic and paper copies.en_GB
dc.author.emailm_omran53@yahoo.comen_GB
dc.rights.embargoterms2027-10-28en_GB
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2027-10-28-
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mohamed Omran - PhD Thesis - Final Submission Version - 2025.pdfPhD Thesis2.82 MBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2027-10-28    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.