Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36433
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | ‘Hidden’ work and lost opportunities: nursing research and impact case studies submitted to REF2021 |
Author(s): | Kent, Bridie Ali, Parveen Farquharson, Barbara Harris, Ruth Johnston, Bridget Kelly, Daniel Mckenna, Hugh McMahon, Ann Taylor, Rachel M Traynor, Michael |
Contact Email: | barbara.farquharson2@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | clinical research longitudinal research research impact research policy workforce and employment |
Issue Date: | Sep-2024 |
Date Deposited: | 6-Nov-2024 |
Citation: | Kent B, Ali P, Farquharson B, Harris R, Johnston B, Kelly D, Mckenna H, McMahon A, Taylor RM & Traynor M (2024) ‘Hidden’ work and lost opportunities: nursing research and impact case studies submitted to REF2021. <i>Journal of Research in Nursing</i>, 29 (6), pp. 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871241261971 |
Abstract: | Aim(s): (1) Identify and characterise the nursing contribution to impact case studies submitted to Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021 across all Units of Assessment and compare this to those submitted to REF 2014; (2) Identify and characterise those impact case studies of relevance to nursing that did not include a nurse in the research team; (3) Compare the characteristics of impact case studies identified in Aim 2 with those that did include a nurse in the research team. Design: Desk-based analysis of REF2021 published data. Methods: We searched the REF2021 impact database with the term nurs* then sorted case studies into categories representing the involvement of nurses on the research team. We developed variables with which to examine the impact case studies (ICSs) and make comparisons. Results: One-fifth of ICSs involving a nurse researcher do not contribute to a visible body of ‘nursing research’ and is ‘hidden’ in other disciplines; research teams persistently fail to involve nurse researchers when researching topics of clear relevance to nurses and nursing. Conclusion: Our findings provide insight into two topics of importance for nursing research: reputation, and failure to benefit from transdisciplinarity. Impact: Benefit to nurse researchers from involvement in transdisciplinary research is still limited; some nursing research remains hidden. |
DOI Link: | 10.1177/17449871241261971 |
Rights: | © The Author(s) 2024. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kent-etal-JRN-2024.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 259.93 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.