Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36425
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDocherty, Devonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJasper, Carolen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-06T01:08:42Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-06T01:08:42Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09en_UK
dc.identifier.other106976en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/36425-
dc.description.abstractResearchers interested in animal ethics have proposed the ‘meat paradox’ - psychological discomfort arising from people's affinity for animals and conflicting desire to consume their flesh. Yet what can be said about the psychology of consuming an animal's non-meat products, in an age where most beings in these industries are harmed, and ultimately killed? Non-meat animal products (NMAPs) such as eggs and dairy entail the same, and perhaps even worse ethical issues as meat yet receive disproportionately less critical attention. Therefore, unlike meat, very little is known about the psychology of egg and dairy consumption. This study looks at vegetarians to address this gap, because they are more likely to show empathetic concern for animals than meat-eaters, yet actively choose to include these products in their diet, a conflict ripe for exploration. Interview data were analysed via thematic analysis, finding that vegetarians perceive robust ethical issues with NMAPs but give various justifications pertaining to personal benefits and social norms. Cognitive dissonance was evident and participants used various strategies to resolve it. This paper expands research on food psychology and animal ethics and may also be used to inform NMAP reduction strategies, an important pursuit in the quest for a more sustainable and compassionate world.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationDocherty D & Jasper C (2023) The cheese paradox: How do vegetarians justify consuming non-meat animal products?. <i>Appetite</i>, 188, Art. No.: 106976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106976en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article. To request permission for a type of use not listed, please contact Elsevier Global Rights Department. Are you the author of this Elsevier journal article? You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectVegetarianen_UK
dc.subjectVeganen_UK
dc.subjectCognitive dissonanceen_UK
dc.subjectDairyen_UK
dc.subjectEggsen_UK
dc.titleThe cheese paradox: How do vegetarians justify consuming non-meat animal products?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.appet.2023.106976en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid37454766en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAppetiteen_UK
dc.citation.issn0195-6663en_UK
dc.citation.volume188en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailcarol.jasper@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date16/07/2023en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001045843800001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85165153561en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1972680en_UK
dc.date.accepted2023-07-12en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-07-12en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2024-10-25en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDocherty, Devon|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJasper, Carol|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2024-10-25en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2024-10-25|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0195666323024388-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0195-6663en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0195666323024388-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version550.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.